» Articles » PMID: 12822013

[The Epidemic of Caesarean Section: Has It Reached Norway?]

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2003 Jun 25
PMID 12822013
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Women's right to decide on the mode of delivery is discussed, as well as the management of term breech deliveries. Obstetric practice may have changed as a consequence of ongoing debates. National caesarean section rates were stable at 12-13% during the 1990s, but no information has been provided about the development over the last two years.

Material And Methods: Information about deliveries in obstetrical units in Norway, 1999 to 2002, was extracted from the Norwegian Patient Register. The number of deliveries was validated against information from Statistics Norway. The numbers of caesarean sections in 1999 and 2000 were validated against information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

Results: The caesarean section rate increased slightly from 12.8% in 1999 to 13.0% in 2000. In 2001, there was a considerable increase to 14.9%; during the first 8 months of 2002, the rate was 15.1%. The change in practice appeared in the last months of 2000, coinciding with the publication of the term breech trial. However, only about one third of the increase can be attributed to a change in breech delivery. COMMENTS. Caesarean section is the most frequent major surgical procedure performed on hospitalised patients. In times of rapid changes in obstetric practice, monitoring of the development without time delay is called for.

Citing Articles

Multicultural doula support and obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a multi-centre comparative study in Norway.

Oommen H, Sagedal L, Infanti J, Byrskog U, Severinsen M, Lukasse M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):854.

PMID: 39716113 PMC: 11667827. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07073-y.


Changes in maternal risk factors and their association with changes in cesarean sections in Norway between 1999 and 2016: A descriptive population-based registry study.

Nedberg I, Lazzerini M, Mariani I, Mollersen K, Valente E, Anda E PLoS Med. 2021; 18(9):e1003764.

PMID: 34478464 PMC: 8452082. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003764.


The quality of denominator data in surgical site infection surveillance versus administrative data in Norway 2005-2010.

Lower H, Eriksen H, Aavitsland P, Skjeldestad F BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15:549.

PMID: 26619949 PMC: 4666046. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1289-x.


Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.

Grytten J, Monkerud L, Sorensen R Health Serv Res. 2012; 47(6):2169-89.

PMID: 22594486 PMC: 3523370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01419.x.