» Articles » PMID: 34453056

Universal Scaling of Robustness of Ecosystem Services to Species Loss

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Aug 28
PMID 34453056
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ensuring reliable supply of services from nature is key to the sustainable development and well-being of human societies. Varied and frequently complex relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem services have, however, frustrated our capacity to quantify and predict the vulnerability of those services to species extinctions. Here, we use a qualitative Boolean modelling framework to identify universal drivers of the robustness of ecosystem service supply to species loss. These drivers comprise simple features of the networks that link species to the functions they perform that, in turn, underpin a service. Together, they define what we call network fragility. Using data from >250 real ecological networks representing services such as pollination and seed-dispersal, we demonstrate that network fragility predicts remarkably well the robustness of empirical ecosystem services. We then show how to quantify contributions of individual species to ecosystem service robustness, enabling quantification of how vulnerability scales from species to services. Our findings provide general insights into the way species, functional traits, and the links between them together determine the vulnerability of ecosystem service supply to biodiversity loss.

Citing Articles

Variability of functional and biodiversity responses to perturbations is predictable and informative.

Orr J, Piggott J, Jackson A, Jackson M, Arnoldi J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10352.

PMID: 39609377 PMC: 11604961. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54540-3.


Harnessing genomic technologies for one health solutions in the tropics.

Calcino A, Cooke I, Cowman P, Higgie M, Massault C, Schmitz U Global Health. 2024; 20(1):78.

PMID: 39543642 PMC: 11566161. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-024-01083-3.


iNAP: An integrated network analysis pipeline for microbiome studies.

Feng K, Peng X, Zhang Z, Gu S, He Q, Shen W Imeta. 2024; 1(2):e13.

PMID: 38868563 PMC: 10989900. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.13.


An empirical assessment of whether urban green ecological networks have the capacity to store higher levels of carbon.

Wan Y, Wang Y, Gao M, Jin L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3132.

PMID: 38326358 PMC: 10850523. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52650-y.


Breakdown in seasonal dynamics of subtropical ant communities with land-cover change.

Kass J, Yoshimura M, Ogasawara M, Suwabe M, Hita Garcia F, Fischer G Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2008):20231185.

PMID: 37817591 PMC: 10565368. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1185.


References
1.
Pimm S, Jenkins C, Abell R, Brooks T, Gittleman J, Joppa L . The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 2014; 344(6187):1246752. DOI: 10.1126/science.1246752. View

2.
Keyes A, McLaughlin J, Barner A, Dee L . An ecological network approach to predict ecosystem service vulnerability to species losses. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):1586. PMC: 7952599. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21824-x. View

3.
Dee L, Cowles J, Isbell F, Pau S, Gaines S, Reich P . When Do Ecosystem Services Depend on Rare Species?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 34(8):746-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.03.010. View

4.
Dee L, Allesina S, Bonn A, Eklof A, Gaines S, Hines J . Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016; 32(2):118-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011. View

5.
Mace G, Hails R, Cryle P, Harlow J, Clarke S . REVIEW: Towards a risk register for natural capital. J Appl Ecol. 2016; 52(3):641-653. PMC: 4979659. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12431. View