» Articles » PMID: 34451949

Effect of Professional and Extra-Professional Exposure on Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Healthcare Workers of the French Alps: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 28
PMID 34451949
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to report SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence after the first wave of the pandemic among healthcare workers, and to explore factors associated with an increased infection rate. We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional survey from 27 June to 31 September 2020. For this survey, we enrolled 3454 voluntary healthcare workers across four participating hospitals, of which 83.4% were female, with a median age of 40.6 years old (31.8-50.3). We serologically screened the employees for SARS-CoV-2, estimated the prevalence of infection, and conducted binomial logistic regression with random effect on participating hospitals to investigate associations. We estimated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 5.0% (95 CI, 4.3%-5.8%). We found the lowest prevalence in health professional management support (4.3%) staff. Infections were more frequent in young professionals below 30 years old (aOR = 1.59, (95 CI, 1.06-2.37)), including paramedical students and residents (aOR = 3.38, (95 CI, 1.62-7.05)). In this group, SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was up 16.9%. The location of work and patient-facing role were not associated with increased infections. Employees reporting contacts with COVID-19 patients without adequate protective equipment had a higher rate of infection (aOR = 1.66, (95 CI, 1.12-2.44)). Aerosol-generating tasks were associated with a ~1.7-fold rate of infection, regardless of the uptake of FFP2. Those exposed to clusters of infected colleagues (aOR = 1.77, (95 CI, 1.24-2.53)) or intra-familial COVID-19 relatives (aOR = 2.09, (95 CI, 1.15-3.80)) also had a higher likelihood of infection. This report highlights that a sustained availability of personal protective equipment limits the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate to what is measured in the general population. It also pinpoints the need for dedicated hygiene training among young professionals, justifies the systematic eviction of infected personnel, and stresses the need for interventions to increase vaccination coverage among any healthcare workers.

Citing Articles

SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers: the role of occupational and household exposures during the first three pandemic waves in Quebec, Canada.

Carazo S, Denis G, Padet L, Deshaies P, Villeneuve J, Paquet-Bolduc B Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023; 3(1):e180.

PMID: 38028905 PMC: 10654992. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2023.442.


Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare personnel in Pakistan: a test-negative case-control study.

Khan U, Niaz M, Azam I, Hasan Z, Hassan I, Mahmood S BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e071789.

PMID: 37369396 PMC: 10410856. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071789.


Risk and protective factors for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers: A test-negative case-control study in Québec, Canada.

Carazo S, Villeneuve J, Laliberte D, Longtin Y, Talbot D, Martin R Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022; 44(7):1121-1130.

PMID: 36082690 PMC: 9530374. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.231.


Risk of transmission of respiratory viruses during aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs) revisited in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Leal J, Farkas B, Mastikhina L, Flanagan J, Skidmore B, Salmon C Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022; 11(1):102.

PMID: 35953854 PMC: 9366810. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01133-8.


Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 antibody screening of 4840 staff members in a University Medical Center in France: a cross-sectional study.

Pierson-Marchandise M, Castelain S, Chevalier C, Brochot E, Schmit J, Diouf M BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5):e047010.

PMID: 35545377 PMC: 9096052. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047010.


References
1.
Iversen K, Bundgaard H, Hasselbalch R, Kristensen J, Nielsen P, Pries-Heje M . Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(12):1401-1408. PMC: 7398038. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30589-2. View

2.
Eyre D, Lumley S, ODonnell D, Campbell M, Sims E, Lawson E . Differential occupational risks to healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 observed during a prospective observational study. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7486122. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60675. View

3.
Guery R, Delaye C, Brule N, Nael V, Castain L, Raffi F . Limited effectiveness of systematic screening by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR of medicalized nursing home staff after a first case of COVID-19 in a resident. Med Mal Infect. 2020; 50(8):748-750. PMC: 7196554. DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.020. View

4.
Solodky M, Galvez C, Russias B, Detourbet P, NGuyen-Bonin V, Herr A . Lower detection rates of SARS-COV2 antibodies in cancer patients versus health care workers after symptomatic COVID-19. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31(8):1087-1088. PMC: 7252166. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.475. View

5.
Moscola J, Sembajwe G, Jarrett M, Farber B, Chang T, McGinn T . Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Health Care Personnel in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020; 324(9):893-895. PMC: 7411936. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.14765. View