Kidney Allograft Function Is a Confounder of Urine Metabolite Profiles in Kidney Allograft Recipients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Noninvasive biomarkers of kidney allograft status can help minimize the need for standard of care kidney allograft biopsies. Metabolites that are measured in the urine may inform about kidney function and health status, and potentially identify rejection events. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a metabolomics study of biopsy-matched urine cell-free supernatants from kidney allograft recipients who were diagnosed with two major types of acute rejections and no-rejection controls. Non-targeted metabolomics data for 674 metabolites and 577 unidentified molecules, for 192 biopsy-matched urine samples, were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified metabolite signatures for kidney allograft rejection. The replicability of a previously developed urine metabolite signature was examined. Our study showed that metabolite profiles can serve as biomarkers for discriminating rejection biopsies from biopsies without rejection features, but also revealed a role of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) as a major confounder of the metabolite signal.
Kuypers D, Kamphorst J, de Loor H, ODay E Biomark Med. 2024; 18(17-18):787-794.
PMID: 39234983 PMC: 11457662. DOI: 10.1080/17520363.2024.2394383.
A universal urinary cell gene signature of acute rejection in kidney allografts.
Salinas T, Li C, Snopkowski C, Sharma V, Dadhania D, Suhre K J Immunol Methods. 2024; 532:113714.
PMID: 38936464 PMC: 11349041. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2024.113714.
Chen Y, Xie Y, Ci H, Cheng Z, Kuang Y, Li S BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):90.
PMID: 38433226 PMC: 10910673. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03272-8.
Clark A, Saade M, Vemireddy V, Vu K, Flores B, Etzrodt V Kidney Int. 2023; 104(6):1150-1163.
PMID: 37783445 PMC: 10843022. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.013.
States of quinolinic acid excess in urine: A systematic review of human studies.
Saade M, Clark A, Parikh S Front Nutr. 2023; 9:1070435.
PMID: 36590198 PMC: 9800835. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1070435.