Recreational Behaviour, Risk Perceptions, and Protective Practices Against Ticks: a Cross-sectional Comparative Study Before and During the Lockdown Enforced by the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania

Overview

Journal Parasit Vectors

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Parasitology
Tropical Medicine

Date 2021 Aug 24

PMID 34425905

Citations 2

Authors

Silvia-Diana Borsan

Sabina Ramona Trif

Andrei Daniel Mihalca

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Gaining insight into the risk perceptions and the knowledge evolution of the public about emerging or changing health risks is vital for the improvement of health promotion activities. Currently, scientific evidence regarding the attitudes of the Romanian public towards ticks is scanty. This study aimed to identify how the lockdown enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania impacted the recreational behaviour, risk perceptions, and protective practices of the Romanian population regarding ticks.

Methods: A cross-sectional, nationwide web-based questionnaire was designed and distributed via social media to evaluate if, and how, the COVID-19 lockdown impacted the behaviour of the Romanian public concerning ticks. The survey was available online from 6 May until 15 May 2020, which marked the last day of the travel ban in Romania. The collected data were processed by applying both uni- and multivariate methods.

Results: Respondents reported a higher frequency of finding ticks on themselves and their dogs during the lockdown. Bathing/showering and checking the body for ticks were the two most used protective behaviours both before and during the lockdown. Nevertheless, an overall lower usage rate of protective measures was registered during the lockdown. Almost all dog owners used a form of ectoparasite control for their dogs, and only three stopped due to lockdown-associated reasons. Respondent characteristics that were found to be positively associated with risk perceptions were being female and living in peri-urban/suburban/rural environments.

Conclusions: Despite spending less time outdoors during the lockdown, more respondents reported finding ticks on themselves or their dogs. Changes in the preferences for recreational locations, rates of protective practices usage, amount of time spent in specific areas, or tick seasonal activity might have contributed to this outcome. Concerning risk groups, men of all ages, senior citizens, and rural inhabitants should be targeted by the relevant Romanian authorities when promoting local or nationwide tick awareness campaigns.

Citing Articles

Detection of multiple tick-borne pathogens in from Hunterdon County, NJ, USA.

Narvaez Z, Rainey T, Puelle R, Khan A, Jordan R, Egizi A Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2023; 4:100140.

PMID: 37680762 PMC: 10481180. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2023.100140.

Mapping and monitoring tick (Acari, Ixodida) distribution, seasonality, and host associations in the United Kingdom between 2017 and 2020.

Hansford K, Gandy S, Gillingham E, McGinley L, Cull B, Johnston C Med Vet Entomol. 2022; 37(1):152-163.

PMID: 36309852 PMC: 10092223. DOI: 10.1111/mve.12621.

References

Strnad M, Honig V, Ruzek D, Grubhoffer L, Rego R . Europe-Wide Meta-Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Prevalence in Questing Ixodes ricinus Ticks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 83(15). PMC: 5514677. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00609-17. View

Aenishaenslin C, Ravel A, Michel P, Gern L, Milord F, Waaub J . From Lyme disease emergence to endemicity: a cross sectional comparative study of risk perceptions in different populations. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:1298. PMC: 4301662. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1298. View

Bayles B, Evans G, Allan B . Knowledge and prevention of tick-borne diseases vary across an urban-to-rural human land-use gradient. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013; 4(4):352-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.01.001. View

Lai C, Shih T, Ko W, Tang H, Hsueh P . Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 55(3):105924. PMC: 7127800. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924. View

Connally N, Durante A, Yousey-Hindes K, Meek J, Nelson R, Heimer R . Peridomestic Lyme disease prevention: results of a population-based case-control study. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(3):201-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.026. View

Slunge D, Boman A . Learning to live with ticks? The role of exposure and risk perceptions in protective behaviour against tick-borne diseases. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0198286. PMC: 6010238. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198286. View

Haglund M, Gunther G . Tick-borne encephalitis--pathogenesis, clinical course and long-term follow-up. Vaccine. 2003; 21 Suppl 1:S11-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00811-3. View

Slunge D, Jore S, Krogfelt K, Jepsen M, Boman A . Who is afraid of ticks and tick-borne diseases? Results from a cross-sectional survey in Scandinavia. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1666. PMC: 6907266. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7977-5. View

Dubey S, Biswas P, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Dubey M, Chatterjee S . Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020; 14(5):779-788. PMC: 7255207. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035. View

10.

Ferrer R, Klein W . Risk perceptions and health behavior. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015; 5:85-89. PMC: 4525709. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012. View

11.

Gupta S, Eggers P, Arana A, Kresse B, Rios K, Brown L . Knowledge and preventive behaviors towards tick-borne diseases in Delaware. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018; 9(3):615-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.006. View

12.

Jepsen M, Jokelainen P, Jore S, Boman A, Slunge D, Krogfelt K . Protective practices against tick bites in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a questionnaire-based study. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1344. PMC: 6805683. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7613-4. View

13.

Gustafson P . Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Anal. 1999; 18(6):805-11. DOI: 10.1023/b:rian.0000005926.03250.c0. View

14.

Brewer N, Chapman G, Gibbons F, Gerrard M, McCaul K, Weinstein N . Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26(2):136-45. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136. View

15.

Christley R, Murray J, Anderson K, Buckland E, Casey R, Harvey N . Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on Management of Pet Dogs in the UK. Animals (Basel). 2020; 11(1). PMC: 7822167. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010005. View

16.

Aenishaenslin C, Michel P, Ravel A, Gern L, Milord F, Waaub J . Factors associated with preventive behaviors regarding Lyme disease in Canada and Switzerland: a comparative study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:185. PMC: 4349712. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1539-2. View

17.

Borsan S, Toma-Naic A, Peter A, Sandor A, Pestean C, Mihalca A . Impact of abiotic factors, habitat type and urban wildlife on the ecology of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in urban and peri-urban habitats. Parasit Vectors. 2020; 13(1):476. PMC: 7501622. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04352-3. View

18.

Ratschen E, Shoesmith E, Shahab L, Silva K, Kale D, Toner P . Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239397. PMC: 7518616. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239397. View

19.

Rizzoli A, Silaghi C, Obiegala A, Rudolf I, Hubalek Z, Foldvari G . Ixodes ricinus and Its Transmitted Pathogens in Urban and Peri-Urban Areas in Europe: New Hazards and Relevance for Public Health. Front Public Health. 2014; 2:251. PMC: 4248671. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00251. View

20.

Egyed L, Elo P, Sreter-Lancz Z, Szell Z, Balogh Z, Sreter T . Seasonal activity and tick-borne pathogen infection rates of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Hungary. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012; 3(2):90-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.01.002. View