» Articles » PMID: 32976500

Human-animal Relationships and Interactions During the Covid-19 Lockdown Phase in the UK: Investigating Links with Mental Health and Loneliness

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Sep 25
PMID 32976500
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic raises questions about the role that relationships and interactions between humans and animals play in the context of widespread social distancing and isolation measures. We aimed to investigate links between mental health and loneliness, companion animal ownership, the human-animal bond, and human-animal interactions; and to explore animal owners' perceptions related to the role of their animals during lockdown.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of UK residents over 18 years of age was conducted between April and June 2020. The questionnaire included validated and bespoke items measuring demographics; exposures and outcomes related to mental health, wellbeing and loneliness; the human-animal bond and human-animal interactions.

Results: Of 5,926 participants, 5,323 (89.8%) had at least one companion animal. Most perceived their animals to be a source of considerable support, but concerns were reported related to various practical aspects of providing care during lockdown. Strength of the human-animal bond did not differ significantly between species. Poorer mental health pre-lockdown was associated with a stronger reported human-animal bond (b = -.014, 95% CI [-.023 - -.005], p = .002). Animal ownership compared with non-ownership was associated with smaller decreases in mental health (b = .267, 95% CI [.079 - .455], p = .005) and smaller increases in loneliness (b = -.302, 95% CI [-.461 - -.144], p = .001) since lockdown.

Conclusion: The human-animal bond is a construct that may be linked to mental health vulnerability in animal owners. Strength of the human-animal bond in terms of emotional closeness or intimacy dimensions appears to be independent of animal species. Animal ownership seemed to mitigate some of the detrimental psychological effects of Covid-19 lockdown. Further targeted investigation of the role of human-animal relationships and interactions for human health, including testing of the social buffering hypothesis and the development of instruments suited for use across animal species, is required.

Citing Articles

The Mental Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Post-pandemic View From a Romanian Sample.

Mitrea A, Haisan A, Casarica A, Enache R, Dantes E Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72631.

PMID: 39610599 PMC: 11604092. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72631.


Dog ownership, physical activity, loneliness and mental health: a comparison of older adult and younger adult companion animal owners.

Zablan K, Melvin G, Hayley A BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):618.

PMID: 39487552 PMC: 11529494. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02104-x.


Unveiling Niaprazine's Potential: Behavioral Insights into a Re-Emerging Anxiolytic Agent.

Trebesova H, Monaco M, Baldassari S, Ailuno G, Lancellotti E, Caviglioli G Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335600 PMC: 11428487. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092087.


The Relationship between Canine Behavioral Disorders and Gut Microbiome and Future Therapeutic Perspectives.

Kielbik P, Witkowska-Pilaszewicz O Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061510 PMC: 11273744. DOI: 10.3390/ani14142048.


Examining evidence for a relationship between human-animal interactions and common mental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review.

Barr H, Guggenbickler A, Hoch J, Dewa C Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1321293.

PMID: 38385049 PMC: 10879592. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1321293.


References
1.
Gomez-Salgado J, Andres-Villas M, Dominguez-Salas S, Diaz-Milanes D, Ruiz-Frutos C . Related Health Factors of Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(11). PMC: 7312369. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113947. View

2.
Hughes M, Waite L, Hawkley L, Cacioppo J . A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2008; 26(6):655-672. PMC: 2394670. DOI: 10.1177/0164027504268574. View

3.
Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C . A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9). PMC: 7246819. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093165. View

4.
Payne E, Bennett P, McGreevy P . Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog-human dyad. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2015; 8:71-9. PMC: 4348122. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S74972. View

5.
Dean A, Lin N . The stress-buffering role of social support. Problems and prospects for systematic investigation. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1977; 165(6):403-17. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-197712000-00006. View