Efficacy of a Modified Transvaginal Ultrasound-guided Fresh Embryo Transfer Procedure

Overview

Journal JBRA Assist Reprod

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2021 Aug 20

PMID 34415124

Authors

Raul Nakano

Moacir R M Radaelli

Litsuko Shimabukuro Fujihara

Flavio Yoshinaga

Enzo Nakano

Carlos Gilberto Almodin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To present a modified transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) guided embryo transfer (ET) procedure and analyze its efficacy in comparison with conventional transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) guided ET in an unselected population of Brazilian women.

Methods: This retrospective observational case-control study involved 447 fresh ET cycles, 221 guided by TVUS (Group 1), conducted between June 2016 and February 2019, and 226 by TAUS (Group 2), conducted between July 2012 and December 2015. Pregnancy rate was the main endpoint. Groups were compared using the Z test at a level of significance of 95% (p≤0.05).

Results: Patient age ranged from 21 and 48 years; mean age was 37.7 years in Group 1 and 38 years in Group 2. Overall, patients that underwent TVUS-guided fresh ET demonstrated significantly higher pregnancy rates than their counterparts that underwent TAUS-guided fresh ET (p=0.0107). TVUS-guided fresh ET also yielded significantly higher pregnancy rates in the subgroups of women aged 36-39 years (p=0.0037) and ≥ 40 years (p=0.0025). However, no significant pregnancy rate difference was observed in women aged ≤ 35 years (p=0.0905).

Conclusions: The results suggested that TVUS-guided fresh ET was at least as effective as TAUS-guided fresh ET in the studied sample. Pending further prospective studies to better ascertain the effect of TVUS-guided ET, the technique presented deserves consideration since it can offer better visualization, more comfort to patients, and requires only one operator, without negatively affecting pregnancy results.

References

Porat N, Boehnlein L, Schouweiler C, Kang J, Lindheim S . Interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing abdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010; 36(2):384-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01148.x. View

Almodin C, Minguetti-Camara V, Paixao C, Pereira P . Embryo development and gestation using fresh and vitrified oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(5):1192-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq042. View

Bodri D, Colodron M, Garcia D, Obradors A, Vernaeve V, Coll O . Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(7):2263-8, 2268.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.028. View

Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, De Ziegler D, Frydman R . Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(7):1968-74. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1968. View

Lesny P, Killick S, Tetlow R, Robinson J, Maguiness S . Embryo transfer--can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions?. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(6):1540-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1540. View

Karavani G, Ben-Meir A, Shufaro Y, Hyman J, Revel A . Transvaginal ultrasound to guide embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(5):1159-1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.023. View

Sallam H, Sadek S . Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(4):1042-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01009-4. View

Schoolcraft W . Importance of embryo transfer technique in maximizing assisted reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(4):855-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.022. View

Cozzolino M, Vitagliano A, Di Giovanni M, Lagana A, Vitale S, Blaganje M . Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: summary of the evidence and new perspectives. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 36(5):524-542. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.015. View

10.

Buckett W . A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(4):1037-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01015-x. View

11.

Abou-Setta A, Mansour R, Al-Inany H, Aboulghar M, Aboulghar M, Serour G . Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(2):333-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.161. View

12.

Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu H, Yarali H . Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(4):1341-1345. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1666. View

13.

Kojima K, Nomiyama M, Kumamoto T, Matsumoto Y, Iwasaka T . Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(12):2578-82. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2578. View

14.

Paladini D . Sonography in obese and overweight pregnant women: clinical, medicolegal and technical issues. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33(6):720-9. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6393. View

15.

Toth T, Lee M, Bendikson K, Reindollar R . Embryo transfer techniques: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine survey of current Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology practices. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(4):1003-1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.040. View

16.

Larue L, Keromnes G, Massari A, Roche C, Bouret D, Cassuto N . Anatomical causes of difficult embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017; 46(1):77-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.004. View

17.

Edwards R, Fishel S, Cohen J, Fehilly C, Purdy J, Slater J . Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1984; 1(1):3-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF01129615. View

18.

Hurley V, Osborn J, Leoni M, Leeton J . Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55(3):559-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54185-5. View

19.

Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, Garrisi G, Mack C, Scott R . Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71(5):836-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00092-8. View

20.

Mains L, Van Voorhis B . Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(3):785-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.030. View