» Articles » PMID: 34408051

Improving Uptake of Fracture Prevention Drug Treatments: a Protocol for Development of a Consultation Intervention (iFraP-D)

Abstract

Introduction: Prevention of fragility fractures, a source of significant economic and personal burden, is hindered by poor uptake of fracture prevention medicines. Enhancing communication of scientific evidence and elicitation of patient medication-related beliefs has the potential to increase patient commitment to treatment. The mproving uptake of cture revention drug treatments (iFraP) programme aims to develop and evaluate a theoretically informed, complex intervention consisting of a computerised web-based decision support tool, training package and information resources, to facilitate informed decision-making about fracture prevention treatment, with a long-term aim of improving informed treatment adherence. This protocol focuses on the iFraP evelopment (iFraP-D) work.

Methods And Analysis: The approach to iFraP-D is informed by the Medical Research Council complex intervention development and evaluation framework and the three-step implementation of change model. The context for the study is UK fracture liaison services (FLS), which enact secondary fracture prevention. An evidence synthesis of clinical guidelines and Delphi exercise will be conducted to identify content for the intervention. Focus groups with patients, FLS clinicians and general practitioners and a usual care survey will facilitate understanding of current practice, and investigate barriers and facilitators to change. Design of the iFraP intervention will be informed by decision aid development standards and theories of implementation, behaviour change, acceptability and medicines adherence. The principles of co-design will underpin all elements of the study through a dedicated iFraP community of practice including key stakeholders and patient advisory groups. In-practice testing of the prototype intervention will inform revisions ready for further testing in a subsequent pilot and feasibility randomised trial.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from North West-Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (19/NW/0559). Dissemination and knowledge mobilisation will be facilitated through national bodies and networks, publications and presentations.

Trial Registration Number: researchregistry5041.

Citing Articles

A person-centred primary care pharmacist-led osteoporosis review for optimising medicines (PHORM): a protocol for the development and co-design of a model consultation intervention.

Sturrock A, Grabrovaz M, Bullock L, Clark E, Finch T, Haining S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e085323.

PMID: 39488418 PMC: 11535682. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085323.


A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol.

Bullock L, Nicholls E, Cherrington A, Butler-Walley S, Clark E, Fleming J NIHR Open Res. 2024; 4:14.

PMID: 39145101 PMC: 11320037. DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13571.1.


Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study.

Bullock L, Manning F, Hawarden A, Fleming J, Leyland S, Clark E Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):50.

PMID: 38898212 PMC: 11186902. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01410-6.


Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.

Sahota O, Narayanasamy M, Bastounis A, Paskins Z, Bishop S, Langley T Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(21):1-169.

PMID: 38634483 PMC: 11056815. DOI: 10.3310/WYPF0472.


Variation in UK fracture liaison service consultation conduct and content before and during the COVID pandemic: results from the iFraP-D UK survey.

Bullock L, Abdelmagid S, Fleming J, Leyland S, Clark E, Gidlow C Arch Osteoporos. 2023; 19(1):5.

PMID: 38123745 PMC: 10733195. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01361-4.


References
1.
Street Jr R, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein R . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. View

2.
Paskins Z, Crawford-Manning F, Cottrell E, Corp N, Wright J, Jinks C . Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: a systematic review and framework synthesis. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(11):e040634. PMC: 7640526. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040634. View

3.
Kitzinger J . Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995; 311(7000):299-302. PMC: 2550365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. View

4.
Paskins Z, Jinks C, Mahmood W, Jayakumar P, Sangan C, Belcher J . Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey. Arch Osteoporos. 2017; 12(1):45. PMC: 5409917. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5. View

5.
Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N . UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017; 12(1):43. PMC: 5397452. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5. View