» Articles » PMID: 26286625

Natural History, Reasons For, and Impact of Low/non-adherence to Medications for Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Community-dwelling Older Women Already Established on Medication: a 2-year Follow-up Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2015 Aug 20
PMID 26286625
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Approximately 15 % of older women on oral medications for osteoporosis could be considered for alternatives including parenteral therapies. Collection of data on socio-demographic/clinical variables is unlikely to be helpful in predicting low/non-adherence. Alternative approaches are needed to identify individuals at risk of low/non-adherence.

Introduction: This study aims to identify individual patient reasons for stopping medications for osteoporosis, and to investigate whether this can be predicted from knowledge about socio-demographic/clinical data, or whether alternative approaches need to be used.

Methods: The Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA) recruited 3200 older women from South West UK, of whom a proportion were on medications for osteoporosis at baseline. Information on self-reported adherence and reasons for low/non-adherence were collected at 6-monthly intervals over a 2-year period. Data was also collected on potential predictors of and impact of low/non-adherence.

Results: Two hundred thirty-three of 3200 (7.3 %) women were on medications for osteoporosis at baseline. Mean length of time on treatment prior to enrolment was 46 months. Of those on osteoporosis medications, 94.9 % were on bisphosphonates; 8.5 % reported low adherence and 21.6 % stopped their medication completely over the 2-year follow-up period. Length of time on medication at baseline did not influence rates of low/non-adherence. Reasons for low/non-adherence to bisphosphonates included side effects (53.9 %), practical reasons such as forgetting to take them (18.0 %) and beliefs about medications (20.5 %). No convincing predictors of low/non-adherence were identified.

Conclusions: Approximately 15 % of older women on oral medications for osteoporosis could be considered for alternatives including parenteral therapies. This has important implications for healthcare provision. Collection of data on socio-demographic/clinical variables is unlikely to be helpful in predicting low/non-adherence. Alternative approaches are needed to identify individuals at risk of low/non-adherence to osteoporosis medications.

Citing Articles

A person-centred primary care pharmacist-led osteoporosis review for optimising medicines (PHORM): a protocol for the development and co-design of a model consultation intervention.

Sturrock A, Grabrovaz M, Bullock L, Clark E, Finch T, Haining S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e085323.

PMID: 39488418 PMC: 11535682. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085323.


The influence of patients' beliefs about medicines and the relationship with suboptimal medicine use in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of quantitative studies.

Rafhi E, Al-Juhaishi M, Stupans I, Stevens J, Park J, Wang K Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(4):811-830.

PMID: 38704779 PMC: 11286706. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01727-9.


Impact of an Outpatient Fracture Liaison Service on Osteoporosis Evaluation Among Patients With Upper Extremity Fragility Fracture.

Seyok T, Collins J, Erikson S, Charles J, Earp B Hand (N Y). 2022; 19(2):256-262.

PMID: 36113071 PMC: 10953516. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221120851.


Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments: a protocol for Development of a consultation intervention (iFraP-D).

Paskins Z, Bullock L, Crawford-Manning F, Cottrell E, Fleming J, Leyland S BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e048811.

PMID: 34408051 PMC: 8375717. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048811.


Bone metabolism genes variation and response to bisphosphonate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Marozik P, Alekna V, Rudenko E, Tamulaitiene M, Rudenka A, Mastaviciute A PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221511.

PMID: 31437227 PMC: 6705789. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221511.


References
1.
Gadkari A, McHorney C . Unintentional non-adherence to chronic prescription medications: how unintentional is it really?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:98. PMC: 3375198. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-98. View

2.
Horne R, Parham R, Driscoll R, Robinson A . Patients' attitudes to medicines and adherence to maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 15(6):837-44. DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20846. View

3.
Chiu C, Kuo M, Yu S, Su B, Cheng T . Adherence to osteoporosis regimens among men and analysis of risk factors of poor compliance: a 2-year analytical review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14:276. PMC: 3849144. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-276. View

4.
Clark E, Ness A, Tobias J . Social position affects bone mass in childhood through opposing actions on height and weight. J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20(12):2082-9. DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050808. View

5.
Horne R, Chapman S, Parham R, Freemantle N, Forbes A, Cooper V . Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e80633. PMC: 3846635. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080633. View