» Articles » PMID: 34399008

Patient Engagement in Care: A Scoping Review of Recently Validated Tools Assessing Patients' and Healthcare Professionals' Preferences and Experience

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Aug 16
PMID 34399008
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care.

Objective: Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care.

Search Strategy: A scoping review of recent peer-reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL-EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient-centredness, empowerment, shared decision-making and partnership in care.

Main Results: Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision-making and patient-centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient-centredness, empowerment and shared decision-making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase.

Discussion And Conclusion: There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time.

Patient And Public Contribution: This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Citing Articles

Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.

Pierce J, Weir C, Taft T, Richards Ii W, McFarland M, Kawamoto K J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59956.

PMID: 39983125 PMC: 11890150. DOI: 10.2196/59956.


Enhancing primary care through integrated care pathways: a convergence of theory and practice.

Jerjes W, Harding D Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1432901.

PMID: 39726896 PMC: 11669714. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1432901.


Health service provider views on measuring patient involvement in healthcare: an interview study with researchers, clinicians, service managers, and policymakers.

Skovsby Toft B, Ellegaard T, Nielsen B, Rossen C, Horluck J, Ludvigsen M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1417.

PMID: 39548481 PMC: 11568535. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11904-1.


Psychometric Properties of the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale (TWEETS) Among Patients with Hypertension in Italy.

Rosa D, Villa G, Marcomini I, Nardin E, Gianfranceschi E, Faini A High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024; 32(1):61-68.

PMID: 39472407 DOI: 10.1007/s40292-024-00688-4.


Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework.

Peters S, Guccione L, Francis J, Best S, Tavender E, Curran J Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):63.

PMID: 39261956 PMC: 11391618. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01394-4.


References
1.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

2.
Carman K, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C . Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133. View

3.
Jerofke T, Weiss M . Development and psychometric analysis of the Patient Perceptions of Patient-Empowering Nurse Behaviours Scale (PPPNBS). J Adv Nurs. 2016; 72(11):2923-2936. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13060. View

4.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

5.
Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C . Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):141-6. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. View