» Articles » PMID: 34395486

Effect of Point Spread Function Deconvolution in Reconstruction of Brain F-FDG PET Images on the Diagnostic Thinking Efficacy in Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Aug 16
PMID 34395486
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of applying Point Spread Function (PSF) deconvolution, which is known to improve contrast and spatial resolution in brain F-FDG PET images, to the diagnostic thinking efficacy in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compared Hoffman 3-D brain phantom images reconstructed with or without PSF. The effect of PSF deconvolution on AD diagnostic clinical performance was determined from digital brain F-FDG PET images of AD ( = 38) and healthy ( = 35) subjects compared to controls ( = 36). Performances were assessed with SPM at the group level ( < 0.001 for the voxel) and at the individual level by visual interpretation of SPM T-maps ( < 0.005 for the voxel) by the consensual analysis of three experienced raters. A mix of large hypometabolic (1,483cm, mean value of -867 ± 492 Bq/ml) and intense hypermetabolic (902 cm, mean value of 1,623 ± 1,242 Bq/ml) areas was observed in the PSF compared to the no PSF phantom images. Significant hypometabolic areas were observed in the AD group compared to the controls, for reconstructions with and without PSF (respectively 23.7 and 26.2 cm), whereas no significant hypometabolic areas were observed when comparing the group of healthy subjects to the control group. At the individual level, no significant differences in diagnostic performances for discriminating AD were observed visually (sensitivity of 89 and 92% for reconstructions with and without PSF respectively, similar specificity of 74%). Diagnostic thinking efficacy performances for diagnosing AD are similar for F-FDG PET images reconstructed with or without PSF.

Citing Articles

F-FDG PET can effectively rule out conversion to dementia and the presence of CSF biomarker of neurodegeneration: a real-world data analysis.

Heyer S, Simon M, Doyen M, Mortada A, Roch V, Jeanbert E Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):182.

PMID: 39135067 PMC: 11320856. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01535-3.


Impact of PET Reconstruction on Amyloid-β Quantitation in Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses.

Ruwanpathirana G, Williams R, Masters C, Rowe C, Johnston L, Davey C J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(5):781-787.

PMID: 38575189 PMC: 11064829. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266188.


Interactions Between Brain F-FDG PET Metabolism and Hemodynamic Parameters at Different Ages of Life: Results From a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Zimmermann G, Joly L, Schoepfer P, Doyen M, Roch V, Grignon R Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:908063.

PMID: 35837479 PMC: 9273887. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.908063.


Dynamic PET Imaging Using Dual Texture Features.

Ouyang Z, Zhao S, Cheng Z, Duan Y, Chen Z, Zhang N Front Comput Neurosci. 2022; 15:819840.

PMID: 35069162 PMC: 8782430. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2021.819840.

References
1.
Jack Jr C, Bennett D, Blennow K, Carrillo M, Dunn B, Budd Haeberlein S . NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4):535-562. PMC: 5958625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. View

2.
Mairal E, Doyen M, Rivasseau-Jonveaux T, Malaplate C, Guedj E, Verger A . Clinical impact of digital and conventional PET control databases for semi-quantitative analysis of brain F-FDG digital PET scans. EJNMMI Res. 2020; 10(1):144. PMC: 7704892. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00733-y. View

3.
Verger A, Doyen M, Campion J, Guedj E . The pons as reference region for intensity normalization in semi-quantitative analysis of brain FDG PET: application to metabolic changes related to ageing in conventional and digital control databases. EJNMMI Res. 2021; 11(1):31. PMC: 7990981. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00771-0. View

4.
Verwer E, Golla S, Kaalep A, Lubberink M, van Velden F, Bettinardi V . Harmonisation of PET/CT contrast recovery performance for brain studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(9):2856-2870. PMC: 8263427. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05201-w. View

5.
Joshi A, Koeppe R, Fessler J . Reducing between scanner differences in multi-center PET studies. Neuroimage. 2009; 46(1):154-9. PMC: 4308413. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057. View