Moving the Goalposts While Scoring-the Dilemma Posed by New PET Technologies

Overview

Journal Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

Specialties Biophysics
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology

Date 2021 May 15

PMID 33990846

Citations 8

Authors

Julian M M Rogasch

Ronald Boellaard

Lucy Pike

Peter Borchmann

Peter Johnson

Jurgen Wolf

Sally F Barrington

Carsten Kobe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Investigating the Impact of Voxel Size and Postfiltering on Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.

Mohymen A, Farag H, Reda S, Monem A, Ali S J Med Phys. 2025; 49(4):597-607.

PMID: 39926131 PMC: 11801078. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_123_24.

A look at radiation detectors and their applications in medical imaging.

Usanase N, Uzun B, Ozsahin D, Ozsahin I Jpn J Radiol. 2023; 42(2):145-157.

PMID: 37733205 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01486-z.

Algorithm for Reducing Overall Biological Detriment Caused by PET/CT: an Age-Based Study.

Spadafora M, Sannino P, Mansi L, Mainolfi C, Capasso R, Di Giorgio E Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 57(3):137-144.

PMID: 37181801 PMC: 10172419. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-023-00788-4.

Small lesion depiction and quantification accuracy of oncological F-FDG PET/CT with small voxel and Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction.

Xu L, Li R, Wu R, Yang R, You Q, Yao X EJNMMI Phys. 2022; 9(1):23.

PMID: 35348926 PMC: 8964871. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00451-5.

Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.

Rogasch J, Hofheinz F, van Heek L, Voltin C, Boellaard R, Kobe C Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35204542 PMC: 8871060. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020451.

References

Houdu B, Lasnon C, Licaj I, Thomas G, Do P, Guizard A . Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 46(2):421-428. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4151-8. View

Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N, Hancock B, Pettengell R, Johnson P . Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(17):1598-607. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408648. View

Seo Y, Khalighi M, Wangerin K, Deller T, Wang Y, Jivan S . Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [Ga]Citrate and [Y]Microspheres PET Image Reconstructions Using Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019; 22(1):208-216. PMC: 6800603. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01347-0. View

Lindstrom E, Oddstig J, Danfors T, Jogi J, Hansson O, Lubberink M . Image reconstruction methods affect software-aided assessment of pathologies of [F]flutemetamol and [F]FDG brain-PET examinations in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroimage Clin. 2020; 28:102386. PMC: 7476314. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102386. View

Sekine T, Delso G, Zeimpekis K, Barbosa F, Ter Voert E, Huellner M . Reduction of F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors. Radiology. 2017; 286(1):249-259. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162305. View

Kurita Y, Ichikawa Y, Nakanishi T, Tomita Y, Hasegawa D, Murashima S . The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on F-FDG PET/CT: comparison with ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction incorporating time-of-flight model and point.... Ann Nucl Med. 2020; 34(4):272-279. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01446-x. View

Akamatsu G, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Tsutsui Y, Baba S, Sasaki M . Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 83(1):226-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.030. View

Hofman M, Lawrentschuk N, Francis R, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10231):1208-1216. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7. View

Chen S, Hu P, Gu Y, Yu H, Shi H . Performance characteristics of the digital uMI550 PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2018 standard. EJNMMI Phys. 2020; 7(1):43. PMC: 7316913. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00315-w. View

10.

Barrington S, Sulkin T, Forbes A, Johnson P . All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 45(2):316-317. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3893-z. View

11.

Badano A . In silico imaging clinical trials: cheaper, faster, better, safer, and more scalable. Trials. 2021; 22(1):64. PMC: 7814719. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-05002-w. View

12.

Schwyzer M, Martini K, Benz D, Burger I, Ferraro D, Kudura K . Artificial intelligence for detecting small FDG-positive lung nodules in digital PET/CT: impact of image reconstructions on diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(4):2031-2040. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06498-w. View

13.

Sonni I, Baratto L, Park S, Hatami N, Srinivas S, Davidzon G . Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality. EJNMMI Phys. 2018; 5(1):9. PMC: 5904089. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x. View

14.

Jansen B, Jansen R, Wondergem M, Srbljin S, de Klerk J, Lissenberg-Witte B . Lesion Detection and Interobserver Agreement with Advanced Image Reconstruction for F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019; 61(2):210-216. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222513. View

15.

El-Galaly T, DAmore F, Mylam K, de Nully Brown P, Bogsted M, Bukh A . Routine bone marrow biopsy has little or no therapeutic consequence for positron emission tomography/computed tomography-staged treatment-naive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(36):4508-14. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.4036. View

16.

Engert A, Haverkamp H, Kobe C, Markova J, Renner C, Ho A . Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9828):1791-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61940-5. View

17.

Munk O, Tolbod L, Hansen S, Bogsrud T . Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative. EJNMMI Phys. 2017; 4(1):5. PMC: 5236043. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-016-0169-9. View

18.

Mairal E, Doyen M, Rivasseau-Jonveaux T, Malaplate C, Guedj E, Verger A . Clinical impact of digital and conventional PET control databases for semi-quantitative analysis of brain F-FDG digital PET scans. EJNMMI Res. 2020; 10(1):144. PMC: 7704892. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00733-y. View

19.

Te Riet J, Rijnsdorp S, Roef M, Arends A . Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical F-FDG PET/CT. EJNMMI Phys. 2020; 6(1):32. PMC: 6937357. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-019-0262-y. View

20.

Badano A, Graff C, Badal A, Sharma D, Zeng R, Samuelson F . Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 1(7):e185474. PMC: 6324392. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5474. View