» Articles » PMID: 34384042

Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions Among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol

Abstract

Smoking burdens are greatest among underserved patients. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces mortality among individuals at risk for smoking-associated lung cancer. Although LCS programs must offer smoking cessation support, the interventions that best promote cessation among underserved patients in this setting are unknown. This stakeholder-engaged, pragmatic randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of four interventions promoting smoking cessation among underserved patients referred for LCS. By using an additive study design, all four arms provide standard "ask-advise-refer" care. Arm 2 adds free or subsidized pharmacologic cessation aids, arm 3 adds financial incentives up to $600 for cessation, and arm 4 adds a mobile device-delivered episodic future thinking tool to promote attention to long-term health goals. We hypothesize that smoking abstinence rates will be higher with the addition of each intervention when compared with arm 1. We will enroll 3,200 adults with LCS orders at four U.S. health systems. Eligible patients include those who smoke at least one cigarette daily and self-identify as a member of an underserved group (i.e., is Black or Latinx, is a rural resident, completed a high school education or less, and/or has a household income <200% of the federal poverty line). The primary outcome is biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence sustained through 6 months. Secondary outcomes include abstinence sustained through 12 months, other smoking-related clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. This pragmatic randomized clinical trial will identify the most effective smoking cessation strategies that LCS programs can implement to reduce smoking burdens affecting underserved populations. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04798664). Date of registration: March 12, 2021. Date of trial launch: May 17, 2021.

Citing Articles

Measuring Representativeness in Clinical Trials.

Sanyi A, Byiringiro S, Dabiri S, Jacobson M, Boyd A, Ogunniyi M Circulation. 2025; 151(5):318-330.

PMID: 39899634 PMC: 11801332. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070299.


Incentives for smoking cessation.

Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone-Banks J, Bauld L, Perera R, Conde M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD004307.

PMID: 39799985 PMC: 11725379. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7.


Smoking cessation and harm reduction: a systematic overview of ongoing, randomized controlled trials.

Derissen M, Scheliga S, Clemens B, Leiding D, Kroger K, Bohner H BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):897.

PMID: 39690417 PMC: 11650832. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06342-6.

References
1.
Taylor K, Cox L, Zincke N, Mehta L, McGuire C, Gelmann E . Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer. 2007; 56(1):125-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.11.015. View

2.
Schroeder S . What to do with a patient who smokes. JAMA. 2005; 294(4):482-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.4.482. View

3.
Ma J, Ward E, Smith R, Jemal A . Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States. Cancer. 2013; 119(7):1381-5. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27813. View

4.
Kathuria H, Detterbeck F, Fathi J, Fennig K, Gould M, Jolicoeur D . Stakeholder Research Priorities for Smoking Cessation Interventions within Lung Cancer Screening Programs. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 196(9):1202-1212. PMC: 6072613. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1858ST. View

5.
Kulak J, Cornelius M, Fong G, Giovino G . Differences in Quit Attempts and Cigarette Smoking Abstinence Between Whites and African Americans in the United States: Literature Review and Results From the International Tobacco Control US Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 18 Suppl 1:S79-87. PMC: 5009448. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv228. View