» Articles » PMID: 34367785

An Evaluation of the Effects of a Non-caffeinated Energy Dietary Supplement on Cognitive and Physical Performance: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2021 Aug 9
PMID 34367785
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A large and growing body of research shows that non-caffeinated plant-based nutritional supplements can increase cognitive and physical performance. This study aimed to build on this work by investigating the possibility that a specific botanical blend (consisting of bacosides, methoxy flavones, pomegranate peel polyphenols, and Moringa oleifera leaf saponins) could improve cognitive and physical performance. To this end, we carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 21-day parallel study on 36 healthy adults. We compared the effects of the botanical blend at baseline to a caffeine and a placebo condition on 1) self-reported alertness, anxiety, and headaches; 2) multiple measures of attention and cognition; 3) physical performance; and 4) stress biomarkers. We found that relative to baseline and compared to the Caffeine and Placebo groups, the botanical blend increased alertness and improved cognitive performance. The cognitive effects were most robust for attention measures. The botanical blend did not improve physical performance on a time to exhaustion (TTE) test. Of note, there was not the expected increase in catecholamine response after the TTE on Day 21, suggesting that long-term botanical blend use decreases the catecholamine stress response of a physical endurance task. In conclusion, we show that, within the confines of this study, a combination of the botanical blend could serve as a safe and effective nutritional supplement to improve cognitive performance.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Hot Tea Infusion vs. Ethanolic Extract of for the Simultaneous Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver, Hyperlipidemia, and Hyperglycemia in a Murine Model Fed with a High-Fat Diet.

Cortes-Alvarez S, Delgado-Enciso I, Rodriguez-Hernandez A, Hernandez-Fuentes G, Aurelien-Cabezas N, Moy-Lopez N J Nutr Metab. 2024; 2024:2209581.

PMID: 38375319 PMC: 10876314. DOI: 10.1155/2024/2209581.

References
1.
Chatterton Jr R, Vogelsong K, Lu Y, Ellman A, HUDGENS G . Salivary alpha-amylase as a measure of endogenous adrenergic activity. Clin Physiol. 1996; 16(4):433-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1996.tb00731.x. View

2.
Dorn L, Lucke J, Loucks T, Berga S . Salivary cortisol reflects serum cortisol: analysis of circadian profiles. Ann Clin Biochem. 2007; 44(Pt 3):281-4. DOI: 10.1258/000456307780480954. View

3.
Button K, Ioannidis J, Mokrysz C, Nosek B, Flint J, Robinson E . Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3475. View

4.
Rogers P, Heatherley S, Mullings E, Smith J . Faster but not smarter: effects of caffeine and caffeine withdrawal on alertness and performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012; 226(2):229-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2889-4. View

5.
Aguiar S, Borowski T . Neuropharmacological review of the nootropic herb Bacopa monnieri. Rejuvenation Res. 2013; 16(4):313-26. PMC: 3746283. DOI: 10.1089/rej.2013.1431. View