» Articles » PMID: 34365220

Will the Clinical Development of 4th-generation "double Mutant Active" ALK TKIs (TPX-0131 and NVL-655) Change the Future Treatment Paradigm of ALK+ NSCLC?

Overview
Journal Transl Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Aug 8
PMID 34365220
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our current treatment paradigm of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) classifies the six currently approved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into three generations. The 2nd-generation (2G) and 3rd-generation (3G) ALK TKIs are all "single mutant active" with varying potencies across a wide spectrum of acquired single ALK resistance mutations. There is a vigorous debate among clinicians which is the best upfront ALK TKI is for the first-line (1L) treatment of ALK+ NSCLC and the subsequent sequencing strategies whether it should be based on the presence of specific on-target ALK resistance mutations or not. Regardless, sequential use of "single mutant active" ALK TKIs will eventually lead to double ALK resistance mutations in cis. This has led to the creation of fourth generation (4G) "double mutant active" ALK TKIs such as TPX-0131 and NVL-655. We discuss the critical properties 4G ALK TKIs must possess to be clinically successful. We proposed conceptual first-line, second-line, and molecularly-based third-line registrational randomized clinical trials designed for these 4G ALK TKIs. How these 4G ALK TKIs would be used in the future will depend on which line of treatment the clinical trial design(s) is adopted provided the trial is positive. If approved, 4G ALK TKIs may usher in a new treatment paradigm for advanced ALK+ NSCLC that is based on classifying ALK TKIs based on the intrinsic functional capabilities ("singe mutant active" versus "double mutant active") rather than the loosely-defined "generational" (first-, second-,third-,fourth-) classification and avoid the current clinical approaches of seemingly random sequential use of 2G and 3G ALK TKIs.

Citing Articles

ALK in cancer: from function to therapeutic targeting.

Voena C, Ambrogio C, Iannelli F, Chiarle R Nat Rev Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40055571 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-025-00797-9.


Diverse clinical outcomes for the EGFR‑mutated and ALK‑rearranged advanced non‑squamous non‑small cell lung cancer.

Lin C, Huang K, Lin C, Hou M, Lin S Oncol Lett. 2025; 29(3):125.

PMID: 39807107 PMC: 11726284. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2025.14872.


Targeting C797S mutations and beyond in non-small cell lung cancer-a mini-review.

Dempke W, Fenchel K Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(11):6540-6549.

PMID: 39697713 PMC: 11651777. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-690.


Promoting reactive oxygen species accumulation to overcome tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in cancer.

Lin W, Wang X, Diao M, Wang Y, Zhao R, Chen J Cancer Cell Int. 2024; 24(1):239.

PMID: 38982494 PMC: 11234736. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-024-03418-x.


Developments in predictive biomarker testing and targeted therapy in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer and their application across European countries.

de Jager V, Timens W, Bayle A, Botling J, Brcic L, Buttner R Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 38:100838.

PMID: 38476742 PMC: 10928289. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100838.


References
1.
Camidge D, Kim H, Ahn M, Yang J, Han J, Hochmair M . Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in Advanced ALK Inhibitor-Naive ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Second Interim Analysis of the Phase III ALTA-1L Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(31):3592-3603. PMC: 7605398. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00505. View

2.
Wu Y, Lu S, Lu Y, Zhou J, Shi Y, Sriuranpong V . Results of PROFILE 1029, a Phase III Comparison of First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in East Asian Patients with ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018; 13(10):1539-1548. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.012. View

3.
Lin J, Zhu V, Schoenfeld A, Yeap B, Saxena A, Ferris L . Brigatinib in Patients With Alectinib-Refractory ALK-Positive NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2018; 13(10):1530-1538. PMC: 6341982. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.005. View

4.
Solomon B, Mok T, Kim D, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T . First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2167-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440. View

5.
Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, Kim Y, Azuma K, Seto T . Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017; 390(10089):29-39. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2. View