» Articles » PMID: 34361372

One-Abutment One-Time Effect on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Aug 7
PMID 34361372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the peri-implant hard tissue change at 6 and 12 months after implant placement between definitive abutment placed at the same time of implant surgery, never removing it, and healing abutment disconnected and reconnected three times until the placement of the final rehabilitation.

Material And Methods: Each partial edentulous patient could receive between 1 and 4 platform-switched implants in the posterior regions. If the implants had primary stability-implant stability quotient (ISQ) equal to or greater than 50, they were randomized to the test group with the abutment inserted at the same time of implant placement (DA) or to the control group, receiving a healing abutment (PA). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, data related with vertical bone level changes (primary outcome) and other clinical parameters (implant mobility, bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque index) were assessed.

Results: 53 implants were included in the trial and completed 12 months follow-up (overall survival rate: 100%). All implants achieved primary stability, with an average ISQ value of 80.9 on the day of surgery. From surgery to 6 months, the mean bone loss was 0.14 ± 0.18 mm for the DA group and 0.23 ± 0.29 mm for the PA group, without statistical significance difference. Between 6 and 12 months, the mean bone loss was 0.14 ± 0.21 mm for the DA group and 0.21 ± 0.27 mm for the PA group, also without statistical significance between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences ( = 0.330) in total bone loss after 12 months between the control and the study groups.

Conclusions: The one abutment one time protocol has at least an equivalent effect on the peri-implant bone level changes when compared with the use of healing abutments that are disconnected and reconnected at least three times.

References
1.
Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A . One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(11):1303-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02111.x. View

2.
Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Payne A . Loading protocols for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 12 Suppl 1:e28-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00152.x. View

3.
Perrotti V, Zhang D, Liang A, Wong J, Quaranta A . The Effect of One-Abutment at One-Time on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Placed in Healed Bone: A Systematic Review of Human Studies. Implant Dent. 2019; 28(6):603-612. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000931. View

4.
Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Ferrari D, Wieland M, Becker J . Influence of frequent clinical probing during the healing phase on healthy peri-implant soft tissue formed at different titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37(6):551-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01568.x. View

5.
Bidra A, Kejriwal S, Bhuse K . Should Healing Abutments and Cover Screws for Dental Implants be Reused? A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2019; 29(1):42-48. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13106. View