» Articles » PMID: 34348750

Patellar Tendon Versus Artificial Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Aug 5
PMID 34348750
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to restore the function of the knee joint, protect the cartilage, and reduce the occurrence of osteoarthritis. However, due to the structural limitations of the human body, it is not possible to perform ACLR with conventional sutures. To restore normal functioning of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), a new ligament must be reconstructed in the position of the previous ACL.

Objective: To compare autografts and synthetic grafts in terms of postoperative knee stability and function SEARCH METHODS: The protocol for this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021243451). Two reviewers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from database inception though February 10, 2021. The following search method was used: ((Autograft) OR (Autologous) OR (Autotransplant)) OR Artificial Ligament AND (Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury [MeSH Terms]) AND (Randomized controlled trial [MeSH Terms]). Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Selection Criteria: We only included randomized controlled trials (level I) that compared autograft and synthetic graft interventions in participants with ACL injury. We included trials that evaluated ACLR using at least one outcome (Lachman test, pivot shift test, IKDC grades, or complications).

Results: A total of 748 studies were identified in the initial literature search, and seven studies that examined only bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts compared with artificial grafts met the predetermined inclusion criteria. The results showed that BPTB grafts were associated with significantly better pivot shift test and Lachman test results and better IKDC grades and lower complication rates than synthetic grafts.

Conclusions: This review indicates that for adults, BPTB grafts perform more favorably than synthetic grafts in ACLR in terms of knee stability, function, and complication. More research is needed to compare autologous tendons and allogeneic tendons with artificial ligaments, especially in elderly individuals.

Level Of Evidence: Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Citing Articles

New Graft Choices for ACL Reconstruction: Update Article.

Lara P, Novaretti J, Nunes G, Cohen M, Ramos L Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(5):e642-e649.

PMID: 39649040 PMC: 11624934. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779335.


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report.

Zheng T, Du L, Chu Z, Li L, Li B, Zhang B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):370.

PMID: 38730370 PMC: 11088125. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07492-0.


Arthroscopic Modified Broström Repair with Suture-Tape Augmentation of the Calcaneofibular Ligament for Lateral Ankle Instability.

Guyonnet C, Vieira T, Wackenheim F, Lopes R Arthrosc Tech. 2024; 13(3):102887.

PMID: 38584641 PMC: 10995735. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.11.015.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented with Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction Systems (LARS) or Synthetic Meshwork of LARS Compared with Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts Alone, a Prospective,....

Zaid H, Yang G, Hua X Indian J Orthop. 2023; 57(9):1497-1509.

PMID: 37609011 PMC: 10441880. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-023-00956-w.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Graft or Synthetic Ligament: Knee Stability and Clinical Outcomes at Three Years Follow-Up.

Moretti L, Cassano G, Caricato A, Caiaffa E, DAprile M, Angiulli F Adv Orthop. 2023; 2023:4022441.

PMID: 37520887 PMC: 10374376. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4022441.


References
1.
Prodromos C, Joyce B, Shi K . A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15(7):851-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0328-6. View

2.
Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Legnani C, Borgo E, Albisetti W . Synthetic grafts for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: 19-year outcome study. Knee. 2009; 17(2):108-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.013. View

3.
Su M, Jia X, Zhang Z, Jin Z, Li Y, Dong Q . Medium-Term (Least 5 Years) Comparative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 4SHG, Allograft, and LARS Ligament. Clin J Sport Med. 2019; 31(2):e101-e110. PMC: 7928216. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000730. View

4.
Tsai S, Lee C, Tong K, Wang S, Lee K, Tsai W . Activity-related outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic ligament advanced reinforcement system. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019; 82(3):235-238. DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000035. View

5.
Parchi P, Ciapini G, Paglialunga C, Giuntoli M, Picece C, Chiellini F . Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARS Artificial Ligament-Clinical Results after a Long-Term Follow-Up. Joints. 2018; 6(2):75-79. PMC: 6059861. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653950. View