» Articles » PMID: 24649411

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Best Practice: A Review of Graft Choice

Overview
Journal World J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Mar 21
PMID 24649411
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is much literature about differing grafts used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Much of this is of poor quality and of a low evidence base. We review and summarise the literature looking at the four main classes of grafts used in ACL reconstruction; bone-patella tendon-bone, hamstrings, allograft and synthetic grafts. Each graft has the evidence for its use reviewed and then compared, where possible, to the others. We conclude that although there is no clear "best" graft, there are clear differences between the differing graft choices. Surgeon's need to be aware of the evidence behind these differences, in order to have appropriate discussions with their patients, so as to come to an informed choice of graft type to best suit each individual patient and their requirements.

Citing Articles

5-years outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized control trial.

Butt U, Vuletic F, Shaikh M, Amanullah , Rehman G, Shah I Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):85.

PMID: 39714511 PMC: 11666688. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1.


Superior Biological Healing of Hamstring Autografts Compared with Tibialis Allografts after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on Second-Look Arthroscopy.

Lee S, Park J, Han S, Bae J, Jang K Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459418 PMC: 11509334. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101631.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Evidence-Based Concepts on Reconstruction, Repair and Future Developments.

Thayaparan A, Kantharuban S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67956.

PMID: 39328699 PMC: 11426957. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67956.


Demographic and Injury Characteristics as Potential Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study.

Motififard M, Akbari Aghdam H, Ravanbod H, Jafarpishe M, Shahsavan M, Daemi A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274276 PMC: 11396503. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175063.


One type of graft for reconstruction of the ACL does not suit all patients based on their characteristics and sports: a scoping review.

Reinerink J, Vendrig T, Keizer M, Hoogeslag R, Brouwer R Musculoskelet Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39249194 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-024-00861-x.


References
1.
Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull A, Amis A . Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(3):250-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0685-y. View

2.
Romanini E, DAngelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E . Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 11(4):211-9. PMC: 3014473. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9. View

3.
Shaerf D, Banerjee A . Assessment and management of posttraumatic haemarthrosis of the knee. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008; 69(8):459-60, 462-3. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2008.69.8.30743. View

4.
Condouret J, Cohn J, Ferret J, Lemonsu A, Vasconcelos W, Dejour D . [Isokinetic assessment with two years follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendons]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2009; 94(8 Suppl):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.09.006. View

5.
Viateau V, Manassero M, Anagnostou F, Guerard S, Mitton D, Migonney V . Biological and biomechanical evaluation of the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS AC) in a sheep model of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: a 3-month and 12-month study. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6):1079-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.025. View