Should Rescue ICSI Be Re-evaluated Considering the Deferred Transfer of Cryopreserved Embryos in In-vitro Fertilization Cycles? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Reprod Biol Endocrinol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Endocrinology
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2021 Aug 5

PMID 34348713

Citations 8

Authors

Alessio Paffoni

Marco Reschini

Valerio Pisaturo

Cristina Guarneri

Simone Palini

Paola Vigano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Total fertilization failure represents a particularly frustrating condition for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. With the aim of reducing the occurrence of total fertilization failure, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the first choice over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures although evidence of improved results is still debated and its use in couples without male factor infertility is not recommended. Among the strategies potentially useful to promote the use of conventional IVF, we herein call attention to the late rescue ICSI, which consists in performing ICSI after 18-24 h from conventional insemination on oocytes that show no signs of fertilization. This treatment has however been reported to be associated with a low success rate until recent observations that embryos derived from late rescue ICSI may be transferred after cryopreservation in a frozen-thawed cycle with improved results. The aim of the present study was to assess whether frozen embryos deriving from rescue ICSI performed about 24 h after conventional IVF may represent a valuable option for couples experiencing fertilization failure.

Methods: A systematic review on the efficacy of late rescue ICSI was performed consulting PUBMED and EMBASE.

Results: Including twenty-two original studies, we showed that clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate obtainable with fresh embryo transfers after rescue ICSI are not satisfactory being equal to 10 and 5%, respectively. The transfer of cryopreserved rescue ICSI embryos seems to offer a substantial improvement of success rates, with pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate equal to 36 and 18%, respectively. Coupling rescue ICSI with frozen embryo transfer may ameliorate the clinical pregnancy rate for embryo transfer with an Odds Ratio = 4.7 (95% CI:2.6-8.6).

Conclusion: Results of the present review support the idea that r-ICSI coupled with frozen embryo transfer may overcome most of the technical and biological issues associated with fresh transfer after late r-ICSI, thus possibly representing an efficient procedure for couples experiencing fertilization failure following conventional IVF cycles.

Trial Registration: Prospero registration ID: CRD42021239026 .

Citing Articles

Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.

Leusder M, van Elten H, Ahaus K, Hilders C, van Santbrink E Eur J Health Econ. 2024; .

PMID: 39729157 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01744-5.

Indications affect neonatal outcomes following early rescue ICSI: a retrospective study.

Geng J, Cai J, Ouyang L, Liu L, Liu Z, Ma C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(3):661-672.

PMID: 38386117 PMC: 10957842. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03040-w.

Comparing the pregnancy outcomes of Re‑ICSI and ICSI embryos in fresh ET and FET cycles.

Jiang Y, Yuan J, Song G, Zhang X, Miao S, Wu X Biomed Rep. 2023; 19(4):66.

PMID: 37649535 PMC: 10463230. DOI: 10.3892/br.2023.1648.

Clinical outcome of different embryo transfer strategies after late rescue ICSI procedure: a 10-year total fertilisation failure cohort study.

Zhu X, Tian T, Jiesisibieke D, Fang S, Zhang N, Ma J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):549.

PMID: 37525112 PMC: 10388511. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05859-0.

Advances in the study of genetic factors and clinical interventions for fertilization failure.

Zhang X, Hu C, Wu L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(8):1787-1805.

PMID: 37289376 PMC: 10371943. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02810-2.

References

Chian R, Lapensee L, Phillips S, Tan S . Observation of pronuclei may not be an absolute indicator for fertilization in rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection oocytes. Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 2(2):83-85. PMC: 5891760. DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-5781.2003.00020.x. View

Rubino P, Vigano P, Luddi A, Piomboni P . The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 22(2):194-227. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv050. View

Boulet S, Mehta A, Kissin D, Warner L, Kawwass J, Jamieson D . Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015; 313(3):255-63. PMC: 4343214. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.17985. View

Xiong S, Han W, Liu J, Zhang X, Liu W, Liu H . Effects of cumulus cells removal after 6 h co-incubation of gametes on the outcomes of human IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011; 28(12):1205-11. PMC: 3241845. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9630-9. View

Sachdev N, Grifo J, Licciardi F . Delayed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) show increased aneuploidy rates but can lead to live births with single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(11):1501-1505. PMC: 5125141. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0743-z. View

Lundin K, Sjogren A, Hamberger L . Reinsemination of one-day-old oocytes by use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66(1):118-21. View

. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(5):494-510. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015. View

van Rumste M, Evers J, Farquhar C . Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (2):CD001301. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301. View

Park K, Song H, Chun S . Late fertilization of unfertilized human oocytes in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: conventional insemination versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(8):419-24. PMC: 3455574. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009409100941. View

10.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera A, Kaser D, Ubaldi F . Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 23(2):139-155. PMC: 5850862. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. View

11.

Moon J, Henderson S, Garcia-Cerrudo E, Mahfoudh A, Reinblatt S, Son W . Successful live birth after transfer of blastocyst and frozen blastocyst from rescue ICSI with application of polarized light microscopy for spindle examination on unfertilized eggs. J Ovarian Res. 2015; 8:22. PMC: 4396738. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-015-0150-6. View

12.

Shalom-Paz E, Alshalati J, Shehata F, Jimenez L, Son W, Holzer H . Clinical and economic analysis of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011; 27(12):993-6. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.579655. View

13.

Grimes D, Schulz K . False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(4):920-7. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826af61a. View

14.

Zagadailov P, Seifer D, Shan H, Zarek S, Hsu A . Do state insurance mandates alter ICSI utilization?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):33. PMC: 7183130. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00589-w. View

15.

Ming L, Liu P, Qiao J, Lian Y, Zheng X, Ren X . Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 24(5):527-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.001. View

16.

DeUgarte C, Li M, Jordan B, Hill D, Decherney A, Surrey M . Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis in combination can result in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(1):200-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.021. View

17.

Sermondade N, Hugues J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Poncelet C, Benzacken B, Levy R . Should all embryos from day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection be transferred during frozen-thawed cycles?. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(3):1157-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.001. View

18.

. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(6):1395-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.026. View

19.

Li M, Li Q, Wang Y, Huang J, Liu P . Blastocyst cryopreservation and cryopreservation-warming transfer is an effective embryo transfer strategy for day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):8260. PMC: 8050289. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87693-y. View

20.

Haas J, Elkan Miller T, Nahum R, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, Zilberberg E . The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 38(1):95-100. PMC: 7822989. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5. View