» Articles » PMID: 36233589

Opportunities and Limits of Conventional IVF Versus ICSI: It Is Time to Come off the Fence

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36233589
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional IVF (c-IVF) is one of the most practiced assisted reproductive technology (ART) approaches used worldwide. However, in the last years, the number of c-IVF procedures has dropped dramatically in favor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in cases of non-male-related infertility. In this review, we have outlined advantages and disadvantages associated with c-IVF, highlighting the essential steps governing its success, its limitations, the methodology differences among laboratories and the technical progress. In addition, we have debated recent insights into fundamental questions, including indications regarding maternal age, decreased ovarian reserve, endometriosis, autoimmunity, single oocyte retrieval-cases as well as preimplantation genetic testing cycles. The "overuse" of ICSI procedures in several clinical situations of ART has been critically discussed. These insights will provide a framework for a better understanding of opportunities associated with human c-IVF and for best practice guidelines applicability in the reproductive medicine field.

Citing Articles

Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).

Claffey A, Ngo A, McIntire D, Doody K, Doody K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39910000 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9.


Intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male factor infertility with low oocyte retrieval: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.

Zhu S, Li H, Lv Z, Liang X, Dong L, Tian D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e080688.

PMID: 39542474 PMC: 11575241. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080688.


Risk Factors for Prematurity and Congenital Malformations in Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancies-A Retrospective Study.

Tocariu R, Dinulescu A, Prejmereanu A, Maier C, Coricovac A, Archir E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518609 PMC: 11546360. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216470.


Racial/ethnic disparity in severe maternal morbidity among women who conceived by in vitro fertilization.

Victory J, John S, Wang L, Koegl J, Richter L, Bayrampour H AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(3):100367.

PMID: 39100508 PMC: 11296243. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100367.


Conventional IVF performs similarly in women with and without endometriosis.

Vigano P, Reschini M, Ciaffaglione M, Cuce V, Casalechi M, Benaglia L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(3):599-607.

PMID: 36637584 PMC: 10033814. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02700-z.


References
1.
De Rycke M, Berckmoes V, De Vos A, Van de Voorde S, Verdyck P, Verpoest W . PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING: Clinical experience of preimplantation genetic testing. Reproduction. 2020; 160(5):A45-A58. DOI: 10.1530/REP-20-0082. View

2.
Mantikou E, Bontekoe S, van Wely M, Seshadri S, Repping S, Mastenbroek S . Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(3):209. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms055. View

3.
Guarneri C, Restelli L, Mangiarini A, Ferrari S, Somigliana E, Paffoni A . Can we use incubators with atmospheric oxygen tension in the first phase of in vitro fertilization? A retrospective analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014; 32(1):77-82. PMC: 4294869. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0368-z. View

4.
Sermondade N, Hugues J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Poncelet C, Benzacken B, Levy R . Should all embryos from day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection be transferred during frozen-thawed cycles?. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(3):1157-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.001. View

5.
Sciorio R, Esteves S . Contemporary Use of ICSI and Epigenetic Risks to Future Generations. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(8). PMC: 9031244. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082135. View