» Articles » PMID: 34345828

Effect of Inhaled Xenon on Cardiac Function in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-A Substudy of the Xenon in Combination With Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Trial

Abstract

Design: A randomized two-group single-blinded phase 2 clinical drug trial.

Setting: A multipurpose ICU in two university hospitals.

Patients: Of the 110 randomized comatose survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm in the xenon in combination with hypothermia after cardiac arrest trial, 38 patients (24-76 yr old) with complete echocardiography were included in this study.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either inhaled xenon combined with hypothermia (33°C) for 24 hours or hypothermia treatment alone. Echocardiography was performed at hospital admission and 24 ± 4 hours after hypothermia.

Measurements And Main Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial longitudinal systolic strain, and diastolic function were analyzed blinded to treatment. There were 17 xenon and 21 control patients in whom echocardiography was completed. Clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At admission, ejection fraction was similar in xenon and control patients (39% ± 10% vs 38% ± 11%; = 0.711) but higher in xenon than control patients after hypothermia (50% ± 10% vs 42% ± 10%; = 0.014). Global longitudinal systolic strain was similar in xenon and control patients at admission (-9.0% ± 3.8% vs -8.1% ± 3.6%; = 0.555) but better in xenon than control patients after hypothermia (-14.4.0% ± 4.0% vs -10.5% ± 4.0%; = 0.006). In patients with coronary artery disease, longitudinal strain improved in the nonischemic myocardial segments in xenon patients. There were no changes in diastolic function between the groups.

Conclusions: Among comatose survivors of a cardiac cause out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, inhaled xenon combined with hypothermia was associated with greater recovery of left ventricular systolic function in comparison with hypothermia alone.

Citing Articles

Gasotransmitters and noble gases in cardioprotection: unraveling molecular pathways for future therapeutic strategies.

Pagliaro P, Weber N, Femmino S, Alloatti G, Penna C Basic Res Cardiol. 2024; 119(4):509-544.

PMID: 38878210 PMC: 11319428. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-024-01061-1.


Pharmacological Cardioprotection against Ischemia Reperfusion Injury-The Search for a Clinical Effective Therapy.

Wang Q, Zuurbier C, Huhn R, Torregroza C, Hollmann M, Preckel B Cells. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37408266 PMC: 10217104. DOI: 10.3390/cells12101432.

References
1.
Dingley J, KING R, Hughes L, Terblanche C, Mahon S, Hepp M . Exploration of xenon as a potential cardiostable sedative: a comparison with propofol after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2001; 56(9):829-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02139.x. View

2.
Nagueh S, Smiseth O, Appleton C, Byrd 3rd B, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T . Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016; 29(4):277-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011. View

3.
Weber N, Toma O, Damla H, Wolter J, Schlack W, Preckel B . Upstream signaling of protein kinase C-epsilon in xenon-induced pharmacological preconditioning. Implication of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate dependent potassium channels and phosphatidylinositol-dependent kinase-1. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006; 539(1-2):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.03.054. View

4.
Lemiale V, Dumas F, Mongardon N, Giovanetti O, Charpentier J, Chiche J . Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39(11):1972-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3043-4. View

5.
Coburn M, Kunitz O, Baumert J, Hecker K, Haaf S, Zuhlsdorff A . Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 94(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei023. View