Socioeconomic Inequalities in Food Outlet Access Through an Online Food Delivery Service in England: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Analysis

Overview

Journal Appl Geogr

Date 2021 Aug 4

PMID 34345056

Citations 16

Authors

Matthew Keeble

Jean Adams

Tom R P Bishop

Thomas Burgoine

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Online food delivery services facilitate 'online' access to food outlets selling food prepared away-from-home. Online food outlet access has not previously been investigated in England or across an entire country. Systematic differences in online food outlet access could exacerbate existing health inequalities, which is a public health concern. However, this is not known. Across postcode districts in England (n = 2118), we identified and described the number of food outlets and unique cuisine types accessible online from the market leader (Just Eat). We investigated associations with area-level deprivation using adjusted negative binomial regression models. We also compared the number of food outlets accessible online with the number physically accessible in the neighbourhood (1600m Euclidean buffers of postcode district geographic centroids) and investigated associations with deprivation using an adjusted general linear model. For each outcome, we predicted means and 95% confidence intervals. In November 2019, 29,232 food outlets were registered to accept orders online. Overall, the median number of food outlets accessible online per postcode district was 63.5 (IQR; 16.0-156.0). For the number of food outlets accessible online as a percentage of the number accessible within the neighbourhood, the median was 63.4% (IQR; 35.6-96.5). Analysis using negative binomial regression showed that online food outlet access was highest in the most deprived postcode districts (n = 106.1; 95% CI: 91.9, 120.3). The number of food outlets accessible online as a percentage of those accessible within the neighbourhood was highest in the least deprived postcode districts (n = 86.2%; 95% CI: 78.6, 93.7). In England, online food outlet access is socioeconomically patterned. Further research is required to understand how online food outlet access is related to using online food delivery services.

Citing Articles

Social inequalities in the use of online food delivery services and associations with weight status: cross-sectional analysis of survey and consumer data.

Cummins S, Kalbus A, Cornelsen L, Adams J, Boyland E, Burgoine T BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e000487.

PMID: 40018610 PMC: 11816591. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000487.

Coverage and Characterization of Food Delivery Services Through a Mobile Application in Small and Medium-Sized Cities in Brazil.

da Costa R, Barros P, Matos J, Horta P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).

PMID: 40003518 PMC: 11855524. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020293.

Can digitalization improve the equality and equity of food environment? Evidence from greengrocers in central Shanghai.

He Z, Chen X Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1452817.

PMID: 39564206 PMC: 11573563. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1452817.

Offline to online: a systematic mapping review of evidence to inform nutrition-related policies applicable to online food delivery platforms.

Jia S, Todd A, Vanderlee L, Farrell P, Allman-Farinelli M, Sacks G BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):542.

PMID: 39558372 PMC: 11575118. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03747-8.

Young people's views and experience of diet-related inequalities in England (UK): a qualitative study.

Er V, Crowder M, Holding E, Woodrow N, Griffin N, Summerbell C Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(4).

PMID: 39175414 PMC: 11341847. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae107.

References

Burgoine T, Harrison F . Comparing the accuracy of two secondary food environment data sources in the UK across socio-economic and urban/rural divides. Int J Health Geogr. 2013; 12:2. PMC: 3566929. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-2. View

Simon P, Kwan D, Angelescu A, Shih M, Fielding J . Proximity of fast food restaurants to schools: do neighborhood income and type of school matter?. Prev Med. 2008; 47(3):284-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.021. View

Keeble M, Burgoine T, White M, Summerbell C, Cummins S, Adams J . How does local government use the planning system to regulate hot food takeaway outlets? A census of current practice in England using document review. Health Place. 2019; 57:171-178. PMC: 6686733. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.03.010. View

Burgoine T, Forouhi N, Griffin S, Wareham N, Monsivais P . Associations between exposure to takeaway food outlets, takeaway food consumption, and body weight in Cambridgeshire, UK: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2014; 348:g1464. PMC: 3953373. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1464. View

Jaworowska A, Blackham T, Stevenson L, Davies I . Determination of salt content in hot takeaway meals in the United Kingdom. Appetite. 2012; 59(2):517-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.018. View

Needham C, Orellana L, Allender S, Sacks G, Blake M, Strugnell C . Food Retail Environments in Greater Melbourne 2008-2016: Longitudinal Analysis of Intra-City Variation in Density and Healthiness of Food Outlets. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4). PMC: 7068484. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041321. View

PENCHANSKY R, Thomas J . The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981; 19(2):127-40. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001. View

Janssen H, Davies I, Richardson L, Stevenson L . Determinants of takeaway and fast food consumption: a narrative review. Nutr Res Rev. 2017; 31(1):16-34. DOI: 10.1017/S0954422417000178. View

Burgoine T, Forouhi N, Griffin S, Brage S, Wareham N, Monsivais P . Does neighborhood fast-food outlet exposure amplify inequalities in diet and obesity? A cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016; 103(6):1540-7. PMC: 4880999. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.128132. View

10.

Smoyer-Tomic K, Spence J, Raine K, Amrhein C, Cameron N, Yasenovskiy V . The association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and exposure to supermarkets and fast food outlets. Health Place. 2008; 14(4):740-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.12.001. View

11.

Granheim S, Opheim E, Terragni L, Torheim L, Thurston M . Mapping the digital food environment: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(4):e036241. PMC: 7204828. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036241. View

12.

Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni C, Sobal J, Falk L . Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite. 1996; 26(3):247-65. DOI: 10.1006/appe.1996.0019. View

13.

Robinson E, Marty L, Jones A, White M, Smith R, Adams J . Will calorie labels for food and drink served outside the home improve public health?. BMJ. 2021; 372:n40. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n40. View

14.

Fleischhacker S, Evenson K, Rodriguez D, Ammerman A . A systematic review of fast food access studies. Obes Rev. 2010; 12(5):e460-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00715.x. View

15.

Partridge S, Gibson A, Roy R, Malloy J, Raeside R, Jia S . Junk Food on Demand: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nutritional Quality of Popular Online Food Delivery Outlets in Australia and New Zealand. Nutrients. 2020; 12(10). PMC: 7601596. DOI: 10.3390/nu12103107. View

16.

Wellard-Cole L, Davies A, Allman-Farinelli M . Contribution of foods prepared away from home to intakes of energy and nutrients of public health concern in adults: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021; 62(20):5511-5522. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1887075. View

17.

Maguire E, Burgoine T, Monsivais P . Area deprivation and the food environment over time: A repeated cross-sectional study on takeaway outlet density and supermarket presence in Norfolk, UK, 1990-2008. Health Place. 2015; 33:142-7. PMC: 4415115. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.012. View

18.

Egger G, Swinburn B . An "ecological" approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ. 1997; 315(7106):477-80. PMC: 2127317. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7106.477. View

19.

Nijman J, Wei Y . Urban inequalities in the 21st century economy. Appl Geogr. 2020; 117:102188. PMC: 7124478. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102188. View

20.

Block J, Scribner R, DeSalvo K . Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: a geographic analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3):211-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.007. View