» Articles » PMID: 34322096

Temporal and Spatial Changes in Phyllosphere Microbiome of Acacia Trees Growing in Arid Environments

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Jul 29
PMID 34322096
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolutionary relationships between plants and their microbiomes are of high importance to the survival of plants in general and even more in extreme conditions. Changes in the plant's microbiome can affect plant development, growth, fitness, and health. Along the arid Arava, southern Israel, acacia trees ( and ) are considered keystone species. In this study, we investigated the ecological effects of plant species, microclimate, phenology, and seasonality on the epiphytic and endophytic microbiome of acacia trees. One hundred thirty-nine leaf samples were collected throughout the sampling year and were assessed using 16S rDNA gene amplified with five different primers (targeting different gene regions) and sequenced (150 bp paired-end) on an Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. Epiphytic bacterial diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener, Chao1, Simpson, and observed number of operational taxonomic units) were found to be nearly double compared to endophyte counterparts. Epiphyte and endophyte communities were significantly different from each other in terms of the composition of the microbial associations. Interestingly, the epiphytic bacterial diversity was similar in the two acacia species, but the canopy sides and sample months exhibited different diversity, whereas the endophytic bacterial communities were different in the two acacia species but similar throughout the year. Abiotic factors, such as air temperature and precipitation, were shown to significantly affect both epiphyte and endophytes communities. Bacterial community compositions showed that Firmicutes dominate , and Proteobacteria dominate ; these bacterial communities consisted of only a small number of bacterial families, mainly and in the endophyte for and , respectively, and and for epiphyte bacterial communities, respectively. Interestingly, ~60% of the obtained bacterial classifications were unclassified below family level (i.e., "new"). These results shed light on the unique desert phyllosphere microbiome highlighting the importance of multiple genotypic and abiotic factors in shaping the epiphytic and endophytic microbial communities. This study also shows that only a few bacterial families dominate both epiphyte and endophyte communities, highlighting the importance of climate change (precipitation, air temperature, and humidity) in affecting arid land ecosystems where acacia trees are considered keystone species.

Citing Articles

Bioactivity and metabolic profiling of crude extracts from endophytic bacteria linked to scope: Discovery of antibacterial and anticancer properties.

Ogofure A, Green E Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e40525.

PMID: 39897816 PMC: 11786630. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40525.


Host selection is not a universal driver of phyllosphere community assembly among ecologically similar native New Zealand plant species.

Noble A, Abbaszadeh J, Lee C Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):35.

PMID: 39891234 PMC: 11786578. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-02000-x.


Divergence and convergence in epiphytic and endophytic phyllosphere bacterial communities of rice landraces.

Sanjenbam P, Agashe D mSphere. 2024; 9(11):e0076524.

PMID: 39475315 PMC: 11580439. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00765-24.


Influence of Growth Support on the Diversity, Composition, and Functionality of Microbial Communities Associated with Tillandsia recurvata.

Siqueira J, de Carvalho L, Santos C, Frezarin E, Pinheiro D, Nicodemo D Microb Ecol. 2024; 87(1):129.

PMID: 39414684 PMC: 11485485. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-024-02448-2.


Diversity of Endophytes of in Different Seasons.

Liu Y, Lu W, Li Y, Zhai B, Zhang B, Qin H Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38276278 PMC: 10819999. DOI: 10.3390/life14010149.


References
1.
Remus-Emsermann M, Schlechter R . Phyllosphere microbiology: at the interface between microbial individuals and the plant host. New Phytol. 2018; 218(4):1327-1333. DOI: 10.1111/nph.15054. View

2.
Fuks G, Elgart M, Amir A, Zeisel A, Turnbaugh P, Soen Y . Combining 16S rRNA gene variable regions enables high-resolution microbial community profiling. Microbiome. 2018; 6(1):17. PMC: 5787238. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0396-x. View

3.
Schreiber L, Krimm U, Knoll D, Sayed M, Auling G, Kroppenstedt R . Plant-microbe interactions: identification of epiphytic bacteria and their ability to alter leaf surface permeability. New Phytol. 2005; 166(2):589-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01343.x. View

4.
Schloss P, Westcott S, Ryabin T, Hall J, Hartmann M, Hollister E . Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(23):7537-41. PMC: 2786419. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. View

5.
Gomes T, Pereira J, Benhadi J, Lino-Neto T, Baptista P . Endophytic and Epiphytic Phyllosphere Fungal Communities Are Shaped by Different Environmental Factors in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Microb Ecol. 2018; 76(3):668-679. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-018-1161-9. View