» Articles » PMID: 34295296

Development of a Prognostic Five-Gene Signature for Diffuse Lower-Grade Glioma Patients

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34295296
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diffuse lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) are infiltrative and heterogeneous neoplasms. Gene signature including multiple protein-coding genes (PCGs) is widely used as a tumor marker. This study aimed to construct a multi-PCG signature to predict survival for LGG patients. LGG data including PCG expression profiles and clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA). Survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and random survival forest algorithm (RSFVH) were used to identify the prognostic PCG signature. From the training ( = 524) and test ( = 431) datasets, a five-PCG signature which can classify LGG patients into low- or high-risk group with a significantly different overall survival (log rank < 0.001) was screened out and validated. In terms of prognosis predictive performance, the five-PCG signature is stronger than other clinical variables and IDH mutation status. Moreover, the five-PCG signature could further divide radiotherapy patients into two different risk groups. GO and KEGG analysis found that PCGs in the prognostic five-PCG signature were mainly enriched in cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA replication pathways. The new five-PCG signature is a reliable prognostic marker for LGG patients and has a good prospect in clinical application.

Citing Articles

Identification and validation of a 17-gene signature to improve the survival prediction of gliomas.

Tong S, Xia M, Xu Y, Sun Q, Ye L, Cai J Front Immunol. 2022; 13:1000396.

PMID: 36248799 PMC: 9556650. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1000396.

References
1.
Sato K, Tahata K, Akimoto K . Five Genes Associated With Survival in Patients With Lower-grade Gliomas Were Identified by Information-theoretical Analysis. Anticancer Res. 2020; 40(5):2777-2785. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14250. View

2.
Ramaswamy V, Taylor M . Fall of the Optical Wall: Freedom from the Tyranny of the Microscope Improves Glioma Risk Stratification. Cancer Cell. 2016; 29(2):137-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.01.009. View

3.
Zhao S, Evans J, Kothari V, Sun G, Larm A, Mondine V . The Landscape of Prognostic Outlier Genes in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 22(7):1777-86. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1250. View

4.
Hu X, Martinez-Ledesma E, Zheng S, Kim H, Barthel F, Jiang T . Multigene signature for predicting prognosis of patients with 1p19q co-deletion diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2017; 19(6):786-795. PMC: 5464432. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now285. View

5.
Wesseling P, Capper D . WHO 2016 Classification of gliomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2017; 44(2):139-150. DOI: 10.1111/nan.12432. View