» Articles » PMID: 34289968

Lifetime Ambient UV Radiation Exposure and Risk of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Anatomic Site in a Nationwide U.S. Cohort, 1983-2005

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 22
PMID 34289968
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has long been associated with UV radiation (UVR) exposure, but data are limited on risks by anatomic site.

Methods: We followed 63,912 cancer-free White U.S. radiologic technologists from cohort entry (1983-1989/1994-1998) to exit (date first BCC via 2003-2005 questionnaire). We estimated associations between cumulative ambient UVR and relative/absolute risks of self-reported BCC by anatomic location via Poisson models.

Results: For incident first primary BCC in 2,124 subjects (mean follow-up, 16.9 years) log[excess relative risks] (ERR) of BCC per unit cumulative ambient UVR = 1.27/MJ cm [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-1.68; < 0.001] did not vary by anatomic site ( = 0.153). However, excess absolute risks of BCC per unit cumulative ambient UVR were large for the head/neck = 5.46/MJ cm/10 person-year (95% CI: 2.92-7.36; < 0.001), smaller for the trunk (2.56; 95% CI: 1.26-3.33; = 0.003), with lesser increases elsewhere. There were lower relative risks, but higher absolute risks, for those with Gaelic ancestry ( < 0.001), also higher absolute risks among those with fair complexion, but relative and absolute risks were not generally modified by other constitutional, lifestyle or medical factors for any anatomic sites. Excess absolute and relative risk was concentrated 5-15 years before time of follow-up.

Conclusions: BCC relative and absolute risk rose with increasing cumulative ambient UVR exposure, with absolute risk highest for the head/neck, to a lesser extent in the trunk.

Impact: These associations should be evaluated in other White and other racial/ethnic populations along with assessment of possible modification by time outdoors, protective, and behavioral factors.

Citing Articles

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation: a double-edged sword in cancer development and therapy.

Yu Z, Zheng M, Fan H, Liang X, Tang Y Mol Biomed. 2024; 5(1):49.

PMID: 39417901 PMC: 11486887. DOI: 10.1186/s43556-024-00209-8.


Clinicopathologic comparison of basal cell carcinoma among a diverse patient population in Los Angeles County.

Choi E, Oberg M, Hijazi M, Hall L, Miller K, Mehta A Skin Health Dis. 2024; 4(4):e379.

PMID: 39104648 PMC: 11297426. DOI: 10.1002/ski2.379.


The Immune Response of Cutaneous Basosquamous- and Squamous-Cell Carcinoma Associated with Sun Exposure.

Grigore A, Oproiu A, Iancu I, Florescu I Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2481-2487.

PMID: 38785466 PMC: 11120243. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050185.

References
1.
Sigurdson A, Doody M, Rao R, Freedman D, Alexander B, Hauptmann M . Cancer incidence in the US radiologic technologists health study, 1983-1998. Cancer. 2003; 97(12):3080-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11444. View

2.
Mancuso M, Leonardi S, Giardullo P, Pasquali E, Tanori M, De Stefano I . Oncogenic radiation abscopal effects in vivo: interrogating mouse skin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 86(5):993-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.04.040. View

3.
Duarte A, Sousa-Pinto B, Freitas A, Delgado L, Costa-Pereira A, Correia O . Skin cancer healthcare impact: A nation-wide assessment of an administrative database. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018; 56:154-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.004. View

4.
Little M, De Vathaire F, Shamsaldin A, Oberlin O, Campbell S, Grimaud E . Risks of brain tumour following treatment for cancer in childhood: modification by genetic factors, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 1998; 78(3):269-75. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981029)78:3<269::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-T. View

5.
Khalesi M, Whiteman D, Rosendahl C, Johns R, Hackett T, Cameron A . Basal cell carcinomas on sun-protected vs. sun-exposed body sites: a comparison of phenotypic and environmental risk factors. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2015; 31(4):202-11. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12170. View