» Articles » PMID: 34283940

Scalable Control of Developmental Timetables by Epigenetic Switching Networks

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 20
PMID 34283940
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During development, progenitor cells follow timetables for differentiation that span many cell generations. These developmental timetables are robustly encoded by the embryo, yet scalably adjustable by evolution, facilitating variation in organism size and form. Epigenetic switches, involving rate-limiting activation steps at regulatory gene loci, control gene activation timing in diverse contexts, and could profoundly impact the dynamics of gene regulatory networks controlling developmental lineage specification. Here, we develop a mathematical framework to model regulatory networks with genes controlled by epigenetic switches. Using this framework, we show that such epigenetic switching networks uphold developmental timetables that robustly span many cell generations, and enable the generation of differentiated cells in precisely defined numbers and fractions. Changes to epigenetic switching networks can readily alter the timing of developmental events within a timetable, or alter the overall speed at which timetables unfold, enabling scalable control over differentiated population sizes. With their robust, yet flexibly adjustable nature, epigenetic switching networks could represent central targets on which evolution acts to manufacture diversity in organism size and form.

Citing Articles

A timed epigenetic switch balances T and ILC lineage proportions in the thymus.

Pease N, Denecke K, Chen L, Gerges P, Kueh H Development. 2024; 151(23.

PMID: 39655434 PMC: 11664168. DOI: 10.1242/dev.203016.


T-cell commitment inheritance-an agent-based multi-scale model.

Andersson E, Rothenberg E, Peterson C, Olariu V NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):40.

PMID: 38632273 PMC: 11024127. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00368-y.


Old school, new rules: floral meristem development revealed by 3D gene expression atlases and high-resolution transcription factor-chromatin dynamics.

Pelayo M, Yamaguchi N Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1323507.

PMID: 38155851 PMC: 10753784. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1323507.


Human neuronal maturation comes of age: cellular mechanisms and species differences.

Wallace J, Pollen A Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023; 25(1):7-29.

PMID: 37996703 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00760-3.


T-cell commitment inheritance - an agent-based multi-scale model.

Andersson E, Rothenberg E, Peterson C, Olariu V bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905091 PMC: 10614897. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.18.562905.


References
1.
Pease N, Nguyen P, Woodworth M, Ng K, Irwin B, Vaughan J . Tunable, division-independent control of gene activation timing by a polycomb switch. Cell Rep. 2021; 34(12):108888. PMC: 8024876. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108888. View

2.
Li X, Chen Z, Desplan C . Temporal patterning of neural progenitors in Drosophila. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2013; 105:69-96. PMC: 3927947. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396968-2.00003-8. View

3.
Verhaeghe J, Van Bree R, Van Herck E, Laureys J, Bouillon R, Van Assche F . C-peptide, insulin-like growth factors I and II, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in umbilical cord serum: correlations with birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169(1):89-97. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90137-8. View

4.
Heinzel S, Binh Giang T, Kan A, Marchingo J, Lye B, Corcoran L . A Myc-dependent division timer complements a cell-death timer to regulate T cell and B cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2016; 18(1):96-103. DOI: 10.1038/ni.3598. View

5.
Otani T, Marchetto M, Gage F, Simons B, Livesey F . 2D and 3D Stem Cell Models of Primate Cortical Development Identify Species-Specific Differences in Progenitor Behavior Contributing to Brain Size. Cell Stem Cell. 2016; 18(4):467-80. PMC: 4826446. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.003. View