» Articles » PMID: 34277458

Comprehensive Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jul 19
PMID 34277458
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains a severe and challenging complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to establish a novel postoperative nomogram-based diagnostic model for the early detection of CR-POPF in patients subjected to PD.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent PD in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from December 2018 to October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for CR-POPF. Then, a novel predictive nomogram was established accordingly.

Results: Among the consecutive 176 patients who underwent PD, 37 (21.1%) patients developed CR-POPF. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, the drain amylase (P = 0.002), serum creatinine (P = 0.009), and serum C reactive protein (P = 0.045) at postoperative day 1 (POD1) as well as the neutrophil count (P = 0.025) and temperature (P = 0.025) at POD3 were identified as independent risk factors for CR-POPF. Based on this, a novel predictive nomogram containing these factors was constructed to predict the probability of CR-POPF after PD. The formulated nomogram showed better performance to detect CR-POPF after PD with a sensitivity of 0.784, specificity of 0.770, positive predictive value of 0.475, and negative predictive value of 0.930 when compared to other predictors. In addition, the predictive value of the nomogram was assessed by a concordance index of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.736-0.892), which was significantly higher than indicators alone. This was further validated and depicted by decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve.

Conclusion: This study established a diagnostic nomogram of postoperative objective parameters that can predict the development of CR-POPF after PD with a good discriminative ability and predictive accuracy.

Citing Articles

Risk stratification of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. How far are we? A scoping review.

Alhulaili Z, Pleijhuis R, Hoogwater F, Nijkamp M, Klaase J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):62.

PMID: 39915344 PMC: 11802655. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03581-9.


Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives.

Yang F, Windsor J, Fu D World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(10):1329-1345.

PMID: 38596504 PMC: 11000089. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1329.


Serum Creatinine and Amylase in Drain to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk after Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Song Y, Zhang S Dig Surg. 2023; 40(6):205-215.

PMID: 37866358 PMC: 10716868. DOI: 10.1159/000533869.


A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using Only Preoperatively Known Data.

Ganjouei A, Romero-Hernandez F, Wang J, Casey M, Frye W, Hoffman D Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(12):7738-7747.

PMID: 37550449 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14041-x.


Drain fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rykina-Tameeva N, MacCulloch D, Hipperson L, Ulyannikova Y, Samra J, Mittal A Int J Surg. 2023; 109(8):2486-2499.

PMID: 37216227 PMC: 10442108. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000482.


References
1.
Smits F, Molenaar I, Besselink M, Borel Rinkes I, van Eijck C, Busch O . Early recognition of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2019; 22(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.07.005. View

2.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017; 161(3):584-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. View

3.
Li Y, Zhou F, Zhu D, Zhang Z, Yang J, Yao J . Novel risk scoring system for prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(21):2650-2664. PMC: 6558436. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2650. View

4.
Guilbaud T, Birnbaum D, Lemoine C, Chirica M, Risse O, Berdah S . C-Reactive Protein on Postoperative Day 1 Is a Reliable Predictor of Pancreas-Specific Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22(5):818-830. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3658-9. View

5.
Kanda M, Fujii T, Takami H, Suenaga M, Inokawa Y, Yamada S . Novel diagnostics for aggravating pancreatic fistulas at the acute phase after pancreatectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(26):8535-44. PMC: 4093703. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8535. View