» Articles » PMID: 27216233

Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies for Post-operative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatic Surgery: a Comprehensive Review

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 May 25
PMID 27216233
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded complications are the development of a post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The prediction and prevention of POPF remains an area of debate with several questions yet to be firmly addressed with solid answers.

Methods: A systematic review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses and randomized trials in the English literature (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, EMBASE) covering January 2005 to December 2015 on risk factors and preventive strategies for POPF.

Results: A total of 49 systematic reviews and meta-analyses over the past decade discussed patient, surgeon, pancreatic disease and intraoperative related factors of POPF. Non-modifiable factors (age, BMI, comorbidity) and pathology (histotype, gland texture, duct size) that indicates surgery are associated with POPF risk. Consideration of anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly modify the risk of fistula. Sealant products appear to have no effect. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion enhance risk, but is modifiable by focus on technique and training. Drains may not prevent fistulae, but may help in early detection. Early drain-amylase may aid in detection. Predictive scores lack uniform validation, but may have a role in patient information if reliable pre-operative risk factors can be obtained.

Conclusions: Development of POPF occurs through several demonstrated risk factors. Anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly decrease risk. Drains may aid in early detection of leaks, but do not prevent POPF.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a novel pancreaticojejunostomy strategy based on the anatomical location of the main pancreatic duct that can reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Xue K, Wang L, Chen L, Liu X, Li A, Wang Z Gland Surg. 2024; 13(10):1693-1707.

PMID: 39544981 PMC: 11558298. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-235.


Pancreatic head resection for carcinoma of the ampulla vateri - better long-term prognosis, but more postoperative complications.

Kuesters S, Sundheimer J, Wittel U, Chikhladze S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Biesel E Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):129.

PMID: 38632147 PMC: 11024026. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03319-7.


A modified single-needle continuous suture of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Zhang B, Li L, Liu H, Li L, Wang H, Li Y Gland Surg. 2024; 12(12):1642-1653.

PMID: 38229848 PMC: 10788565. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-340.


Serum amylase on postoperative day 1 is superior to serum lipase in predicting clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Mintziras I, Wachter S, Manoharan J, Albers M, Kanngiesser V, Maurer E Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):359.

PMID: 37714999 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03090-1.


Intraoperative pancreas stump perfusion assessment during pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic scoping review.

Robertson F, Spiers H, Lim W, Loveday B, Roberts K, Pandanaboyana S World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(8):1799-1807.

PMID: 37701689 PMC: 10494594. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1799.


References
1.
Diener M, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler C, Huttner F, Antes G . Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (11):CD006053. PMC: 4356182. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub5. View

2.
Lei P, Fang J, Huang Y, Zheng Z, Wei B, Wei H . Pancreaticogastrostomy or pancreaticojejunostomy? Methods of digestive continuity reconstruction after pancreaticodudenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(12):1444-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.024. View

3.
Behrman S, Zarzaur B, Parmar A, Riall T, Hall B, Pitt H . Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 19(1):72-9. PMC: 5543705. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2608-z. View

4.
Amico E, Alves J, Joao S, Guimaraes P, da Silva Barreto E, Silva Barreto L . Complications after pancreatectomies: prospective study after ISGFP and ISGPS new classifications. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013; 26(3):213-8. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000300011. View

5.
Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi C, Wang X . Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2014; 102(1):4-15. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9653. View