» Articles » PMID: 34276982

The Psychosocial Impact of Surgical Complications on the Operating Surgeon: A Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Jul 19
PMID 34276982
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: Surgical complications are common, and their management is an integral part of surgical care. The impact on the surgeon, the "second victim" is significant, particularly in terms of psychological health. The aim of this review is to describe the nature of psychosocial consequences of surgical complications on the surgeons involved.

Method: Following scoping review protocols, we set out to identify the evidence-base for psychosocial consequences on the operating surgeon, predominantly general surgeons, following surgical complications.

Results: This scoping review identified 19 articles, mainly survey and interview based (n = 8), with all but one article from first world countries. Seven articles reported on negative emotions or depressive behavioural responses. All original studies reported on difficulty in coping (37.5%), and a range of behaviours. There was little evidence for support structures or active interventions to aid the surgeon post complication.

Conclusions: The review suggests that the psychosocial impact, following a complication, is variable but affects every surgeon irrespective of the level of impact on the patient. The main variables differentiating impact are severity, and outcome of the complication and seniority of the surgeon. Reported emotions and behaviours were generally negative and persist across the surgeon's journey towards recovery. Surgeons who manage stress well exhibit largely constructive behaviours and actively work to recover. Identification of variables underpinning complications, and affected surgeons is paramount, as is the provision of services to support recovery. Efforts should be made to proactively prevent complications, via education, awareness and to formalise support processes.

Citing Articles

Beyond the operating room: addressing the "second-victim" phenomenon in surgical practice.

Awuah W, Aderinto N, Ahluwalia A, Poornaselvan J, Tan J, Bharadwaj H Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):486.

PMID: 39367498 PMC: 11452961. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02084-z.


Dealing With Complications as a Young Surgeon.

Gold P, Arshi A Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101419.

PMID: 39071839 PMC: 11282428. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101419.


Psychosocial impact of surgical complications and the coping mechanisms among surgeons in Uganda and Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Sikakulya F, Muhumuza J, Vivalya B, Mambo S, Kamabu L, Muteke J PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(4):e0003180.

PMID: 38683841 PMC: 11057973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003180.


A toolkit for individualizing interventions to mitigate second-victim syndrome in a diverse surgery community.

Eidt J, Mannoia K J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023; 12(2):101680.

PMID: 37699443 PMC: 11523343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.019.


Learning from experience: a qualitative study of surgeons' perspectives on reporting and dealing with serious adverse events.

Oyri S, Soreide K, Soreide E, Tjomsland O BMJ Open Qual. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 37286299 PMC: 10254780. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002368.


References
1.
Pellino G, Pellino I . Deaths, errors and second victims in surgery: an underestimated problem. Br J Surg. 2019; 107(1):152. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11432. View

2.
Seys D, Wu A, Van Gerven E, Vleugels A, Euwema M, Panella M . Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2012; 36(2):135-62. DOI: 10.1177/0163278712458918. View

3.
Joliat G, Demartines N, Uldry E . Systematic review of the impact of patient death on surgeons. Br J Surg. 2019; 106(11):1429-1432. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11264. View

4.
Ghosh K . Violence against doctors: A wake-up call. Indian J Med Res. 2018; 148(2):130-133. PMC: 6206759. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1299_17. View

5.
Colquhoun H, Levac D, OBrien K, Straus S, Tricco A, Perrier L . Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(12):1291-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. View