» Articles » PMID: 34266436

Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Osteopaths in Implementing a Biopsychosocial (BPS) Framework of Care when Managing People with Musculoskeletal Pain - a Mixed Methods Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Jul 16
PMID 34266436
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines commonly recommend adopting a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework by practitioners managing musculoskeletal pain. However, it remains unclear how osteopaths implement a BPS framework in the management of musculoskeletal pain. Hence, the objective of this review was to systematically appraise the literature on the current practices, barriers and facilitators experienced by osteopaths in implementing a BPS framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: The following electronic databases from January 2005 to August 2020 were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, ProQuest Central and SCOPUS. Two independent reviewers reviewed the articles retrieved from the databases to assess for eligibility. Any studies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods) that investigated the use or application of the BPS approach in osteopathic practice were included in the review. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist was used to appraise the qualitative studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise quantitative or mixed methods studies. Advanced convergent meta-integration was used to synthesise data from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.

Results: A total of 6 studies (two quantitative, three qualitative and one mixed methods) were included in the final review. While two key concepts (current practice and embracing a BPS approach) were generated using advanced meta-integration synthesis, two concepts (barriers and enablers) were informed from qualitative only data.

Discussion: Our review finding showed that current osteopathic practice occurs within in the biomedical model of care. Although, osteopaths are aware of the theoretical underpinnings of the BPS model and identified the need to embrace it, various barriers exist that may prevent osteopaths from implementing the BPS model in clinical practice. Ongoing education and/or workshops may be necessary to enable osteopaths to implement a BPS approach.

Citing Articles

Insights into how manual therapists incorporate the biopsychosocial-enactive model in the care of individuals with CLBP: a qualitative study.

Bianchi M, Rossettini G, Cerritelli F, Esteves J Chiropr Man Therap. 2025; 33(1):7.

PMID: 39966819 PMC: 11837614. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00574-3.


Incorporating Physical Activity Assessments and Behavior Change Techniques Into Geriatrics.

Wingood M, Bean J, Linsky A Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024; 5(4):100293.

PMID: 38163022 PMC: 10757171. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100293.


Effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: a factorial randomized trial.

Bohlen L, Schwarze J, Richter J, Gietl B, Lazarov C, Kopyakova A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16953.

PMID: 36217012 PMC: 9551048. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20452-9.


Beliefs and Use of Palpatory Findings in Osteopathic Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Italian Osteopaths.

Bergna A, Galli M, Todisco F, Berti F Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36141259 PMC: 9498689. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091647.


Barriers and facilitators experienced by osteopaths in implementing a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain - a mixed methods systematic review.

Sampath K, Darlow B, Tumilty S, Shillito W, Hanses M, Devan H BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):695.

PMID: 34266436 PMC: 8281672. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06720-w.

References
1.
Kamper S, Apeldoorn A, Chiarotto A, Smeets R, Ostelo R, Guzman J . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350:h444. PMC: 4353283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h444. View

2.
. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. PMC: 5605509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. View

3.
Thomson O, Petty N, Moore A . A qualitative grounded theory study of the conceptions of clinical practice in osteopathy - a continuum from technical rationality to professional artistry. Man Ther. 2013; 19(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.06.005. View

4.
Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin C, Gulmezoglu M . Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med. 2015; 12(10):e1001895. PMC: 4624425. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895. View

5.
Foster N, Delitto A . Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice--challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(5):790-803. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100326. View