» Articles » PMID: 34257588

Evaluation of Protein Purification Techniques and Effects of Storage Duration on LC-MS/MS Analysis of Archived FFPE Human CRC Tissues

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jul 14
PMID 34257588
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To elucidate cancer pathogenesis and its mechanisms at the molecular level, the collecting and characterization of large individual patient tissue cohorts are required. Since most pathology institutes routinely preserve biopsy tissues by standardized methods of formalin fixation and paraffin embedment, these archived FFPE tissues are important collections of pathology material that include patient metadata, such as medical history and treatments. FFPE blocks can be stored under ambient conditions for decades, while retaining cellular morphology, due to modifications induced by formalin. However, the effect of long-term storage, at resource-limited institutions in developing countries, on extractable protein quantity/quality has not yet been investigated. In addition, the optimal sample preparation techniques required for accurate and reproducible results from label-free LC-MS/MS analysis across block ages remains unclear. This study investigated protein extraction efficiency of 1, 5, and 10-year old human colorectal carcinoma resection tissue and assessed three different gel-free protein purification methods for label-free LC-MS/MS analysis. A sample size of n = 17 patients per experimental group (with experiment power = 0.7 and = 0.05, resulting in 70% confidence level) was selected. Data were evaluated in terms of protein concentration extracted, peptide/protein identifications, method reproducibility and efficiency, sample proteome integrity (due to storage time), as well as protein/peptide distribution according to biological processes, cellular components, and physicochemical properties. Data are available ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD017198. The results indicate that the amount of protein extracted is significantly dependent on block age ( < 0.0001), with older blocks yielding less protein than newer blocks. Detergent removal plates were the most efficient and overall reproducible protein purification method with regard to number of peptide and protein identifications, followed by the MagReSyn SP3/HILIC method (with on-bead enzymatic digestion), and lastly the acetone precipitation and formic acid resolubilization method. Overall, the results indicate that long-term storage of FFPE tissues (as measured by methionine oxidation) does not considerably interfere with retrospective proteomic analysis ( > 0.1). Block age mainly affects initial protein extraction yields and does not extensively impact on subsequent label-free LC-MS/MS analysis results.

Citing Articles

The effect of storage time and temperature on the proteomic analysis of FFPE tissue sections.

Koh J, Sykes E, Rukhaya J, Anees A, Zhong Q, Jackson C Clin Proteomics. 2025; 22(1):5.

PMID: 39910438 PMC: 11796064. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-025-09529-5.


A Fast-Tracking Sample Preparation Protocol for Proteomics of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissues.

Darville L, Lockhart J, Reddy S, Fang B, Izumi V, Boyle T Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2823:193-223.

PMID: 39052222 PMC: 11648944. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3922-1_13.


Differential Expression of Proteins Associated with Bipolar Disorder as Identified Using the PeptideShaker Software.

Seregin A, Smirnova L, Dmitrieva E, Zavialova M, Simutkin G, Ivanova S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(20).

PMID: 37894929 PMC: 10607299. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015250.


Inter-Regional Proteomic Profiling of the Human Brain Using an Optimized Protein Extraction Method from Formalin-Fixed Tissue to Identify Signaling Pathways.

Davidson J, Rayner S, Liu S, Cheng F, Ieva A, Chung R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36901711 PMC: 10001664. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054283.


Biomarker Analysis of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Clinical Tissues Using Proteomics.

Obi E, Tellock D, Thomas G, Veenstra T Biomolecules. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36671481 PMC: 9855471. DOI: 10.3390/biom13010096.


References
1.
Batth T, Tollenaere M, Ruther P, Gonzalez-Franquesa A, Prabhakar B, Bekker-Jensen S . Protein Aggregation Capture on Microparticles Enables Multipurpose Proteomics Sample Preparation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019; 18(5):1027-1035. PMC: 6495262. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.001270. View

2.
Andersen C, Christensen L, Thorsen K, Schepeler T, Sorensen F, Verspaget H . Dysregulation of the transcription factors SOX4, CBFB and SMARCC1 correlates with outcome of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009; 100(3):511-23. PMC: 2658541. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604884. View

3.
Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai J, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu D . The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D442-D450. PMC: 6323896. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. View

4.
Piehowski P, Petyuk V, Sontag R, Gritsenko M, Weitz K, Fillmore T . Residual tissue repositories as a resource for population-based cancer proteomic studies. Clin Proteomics. 2018; 15:26. PMC: 6074037. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-018-9202-4. View

5.
Hughes C, Sorensen P, Morin G . A Standardized and Reproducible Proteomics Protocol for Bottom-Up Quantitative Analysis of Protein Samples Using SP3 and Mass Spectrometry. Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1959:65-87. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9164-8_5. View