» Articles » PMID: 34256231

Functionalized 3D-printed Silk-hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Regeneration with Innervation and Vascularization

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2021 Jul 13
PMID 34256231
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our goal was to generate functionalized 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration using silk-hydroxyapatite bone cements and osteoinductive, proangiogenic and neurotrophic growth factors or morphogens for accelerated bone formation. 3D printing was utilized to generate macroporous scaffolds with controlled geometries and architectures that promote osseointegration. We build on the knowledge that the osteoinductive factor Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP2) can also positively impact vascularization, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) can impact osteoblastic differentiation, and that Neural Growth Factor (NGF)-mediated signaling can influence bone regeneration. We assessed functions on the 3D printed construct via the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells; migration and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells; and proliferation of human induced neural stem cells. The scaffolds provided mechanical properties suitable for bone and the materials were cytocompatible, osteoconductive and maintained the activity of the morphogens and cytokines. Synergistic outcomes between BMP-2, VEGF and NGF in terms of osteoblastic differentiation in vitro were identified, based on the upregulation of genes associated with osteoblastic differentiation (Runt-related transcription factor-2, Osteopontin, Bone Sialoprotein). Additional studies will be required to assess these scaffold designs in vivo. These results are expected to have a strong impact in bone regeneration in dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Citing Articles

Strategies for promoting neurovascularization in bone regeneration.

Li X, Zhao Y, Miao L, An Y, Wu F, Han J Mil Med Res. 2025; 12(1):9.

PMID: 40025573 PMC: 11874146. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-025-00596-1.


Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.

Chen S, Wu Z, Huang Z, Liang C, Lee S Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39992621 DOI: 10.1007/s13770-025-00704-1.


Application and progress of 3D printed biomaterials in osteoporosis.

Wang C, Liu A, Zhao Z, Ying T, Deng S, Jian Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1541746.

PMID: 39968010 PMC: 11832546. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1541746.


Advances in growth factor-containing 3D printed scaffolds in orthopedics.

Zhan L, Zhou Y, Liu R, Sun R, Li Y, Tian Y Biomed Eng Online. 2025; 24(1):14.

PMID: 39920740 PMC: 11806769. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-025-01346-z.


A Procedural Overview of the Involvement of Small Molecules in the Nervous System in the Regulation of Bone Healing.

Wei X, Li M, You J, Luo J, Zhai J, Zhang J Int J Nanomedicine. 2025; 20:1263-1284.

PMID: 39906525 PMC: 11792627. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S505677.


References
1.
Zhang W, Zhu C, Ye D, Xu L, Zhang X, Wu Q . Porous silk scaffolds for delivery of growth factors and stem cells to enhance bone regeneration. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102371. PMC: 4106788. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102371. View

2.
Yan Y, Chen H, Zhang H, Guo C, Yang K, Chen K . Vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2018; 190-191:97-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033. View

3.
DallOca C, Maluta T, Cavani F, Morbioli G, Bernardi P, Sbarbati A . The biocompatibility of porous vs non-porous bone cements: a new methodological approach. Eur J Histochem. 2014; 58(2):2255. PMC: 4083320. DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2014.2255. View

4.
Roberts T, Rosenbaum A . Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012; 8(4):114-24. PMC: 3562252. DOI: 10.4161/org.23306. View

5.
Quade M, Vater C, Schlootz S, Bolte J, Langanke R, Bretschneider H . Strontium enhances BMP-2 mediated bone regeneration in a femoral murine bone defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019; 108(1):174-182. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34376. View