Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Perceptions, and Disparities in Children and Adolescents

Overview

Journal J Nutr Educ Behav

Publisher Elsevier

Date 2021 Jul 11

PMID 34246410

Citations 16

Authors

Athena Roesler

Nadia Rojas

Jennifer Falbe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) perceptions-knowledge, attitudes, and norms and media literacy-and beverage consumption, and to identify differences in beverage consumption and SSB perceptions by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Diverse California school district.

Participants: A total of 992 fifth-grade (elementary), seventh-grade (middle), and ninth-12th-grade (high school) students.

Main Outcome Measures: Questionnaire-assessed continuous beverage consumption and perceptions.

Analysis: Linear regression adjusting for school, grade, gender, race/ethnicity, and free and reduced-price meal (FRPM) eligibility.

Results: Knowledge, attitudes, and norms, and media literacy items were associated with SSB consumption in expected directions (P < 0.05). Among elementary students, FRPM-eligible and Black students had higher SSB consumption (P < 0.01). In middle/high school, non-Hispanic White students consumed fewer SSBs than all other racial/ethnic groups (P < 0.01). There were differences in SSB-related perceptions by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (eg, Black students perceived sugary drinks as less unhealthy); Black, Hispanic, and FRPM-eligible students expressed less distrust of food/beverage advertisements; and Black, Hispanic, Asian, multirace, and FRPM-eligible students perceived more frequent SSB consumption among their peers (P < 0.05).

Conclusions And Implications: Sugar-sweetened beverage perceptions were associated with SSB consumption. There were racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in SSB consumption and perceptions. Sugar-sweetened beverage perceptions and related social and commercial determinants like marketing may be useful targets for reducing SSB consumption.

Citing Articles

Social epidemiology of early adolescent nutrition.

Nagata J, Helmer C, Wong J, Diep T, Domingue S, Do R Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39870773 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03838-z.

Effect of a Nutritional Education Intervention on the Reduction of Added Sugar Consumption in Schoolchildren in Southeastern Mexico: Community Study.

Morales-Ruan C, Shamah-Levy T, Valenzuela-Bravo D, Uribe-Carvajal R, Hernandez-Palafox C, Medina-Zacarias M Foods. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39856846 PMC: 11764812. DOI: 10.3390/foods14020179.

Clusters of diet, physical activity, screen-time and sleep among adolescents and associations with 3-year change in indicators of adiposity.

Alosaimi N, Sherar L, Griffiths P, Hamer M, Pearson N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316186.

PMID: 39715228 PMC: 11666017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316186.

Associations Between Perceived Parental and Michigan Middle-School Students' Lifestyle Characteristics.

Rogers R, Marcotte K, Krallman R, Pai C, Montgomery D, DuRussel-Weston J Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241268316.

PMID: 39554933 PMC: 11562258. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241268316.

A Content Analysis of Online Messages about Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.

Li Y, Shen L, Dillard J, Li S Nutrients. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38613038 PMC: 11013644. DOI: 10.3390/nu16071005.

References

Falbe J, Cotterman C, Linchey J, Madsen K . Ethnic Disparities in Trends in High BMI Among California Adolescents, 2003-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(2):e45-e55. PMC: 4958536. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.010. View

Malik V, Popkin B, Bray G, Despres J, Hu F . Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010; 121(11):1356-64. PMC: 2862465. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. View

Perkins J, Perkins H, Craig D . Misperceptions of peer norms as a risk factor for sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among secondary school students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(12):1916-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.008. View

Rosinger A, Herrick K, Gahche J, Park S . Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption Among U.S. Youth, 2011-2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2017; (271):1-8. View

Bandura A . Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(2):143-64. DOI: 10.1177/1090198104263660. View

Falbe J, Madsen K . Growing Momentum for Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Campaigns and Policies: Costs and Considerations. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(6):835-838. PMC: 5425901. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303805. View

Boyland E, Nolan S, Kelly B, Tudur-Smith C, Jones A, Halford J . Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016; 103(2):519-33. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.120022. View

Brener N, Collins J, Kann L, Warren C, Williams B . Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141(6):575-80. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117473. View

Park S, Onufrak S, Sherry B, Blanck H . The relationship between health-related knowledge and sugar-sweetened beverage intake among US adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 114(7):1059-1066. PMC: 4470487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.11.003. View

10.

Bleich S, Vercammen K, Koma J, Li Z . Trends in Beverage Consumption Among Children and Adults, 2003-2014. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017; 26(2):432-441. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22056. View

11.

Brener N, Billy J, Grady W . Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003; 33(6):436-57. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00052-1. View

12.

Hall M, Lazard A, Grummon A, Mendel J, Smith Taillie L . The impact of front-of-package claims, fruit images, and health warnings on consumers' perceptions of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks: Three randomized experiments. Prev Med. 2020; 132:105998. PMC: 7085890. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105998. View

13.

Forde H, White M, Levy L, Greaves F, Hammond D, Vanderlee L . The Relationship between Self-Reported Exposure to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Promotions and Intake: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2017 International Food Policy Study. Nutrients. 2019; 11(12). PMC: 6950183. DOI: 10.3390/nu11123047. View

14.

Han E, Powell L . Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 113(1):43-53. PMC: 3662243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016. View

15.

Falbe J, Thompson H, Becker C, Rojas N, McCulloch C, Madsen K . Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106(10):1865-71. PMC: 5024386. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362. View

16.

Williams R . A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2):645-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00645.x. View

17.

Colchero M, Popkin B, Rivera J, Ng S . Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016; 352:h6704. PMC: 4986313. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h6704. View

18.

Lane H, Porter K, Hecht E, Harris P, Kraak V, Zoellner J . Kids SIP smartER: A Feasibility Study to Reduce Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Middle School Youth in Central Appalachia. Am J Health Promot. 2017; 32(6):1386-1401. PMC: 5993639. DOI: 10.1177/0890117117715052. View

19.

Kansagra S, Kennelly M, Nonas C, J Curtis C, Van Wye G, Goodman A . Reducing sugary drink consumption: New York City's approach. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(4):e61-4. PMC: 4358191. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302497. View

20.

Falbe J, Grummon A, Rojas N, Ryan-Ibarra S, Silver L, Madsen K . Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019. Am J Public Health. 2020; 110(9):1429-1437. PMC: 7427219. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. View