» Articles » PMID: 34232279

Age, Sex, and Inhibitory Control: Identifying a Specific Impairment in Memorial, But Not Perceptual, Inhibition in Older Women

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 7
PMID 34232279
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Declines in the ability to inhibit information, and the consequences to memory of unsuccessful inhibition, have been frequently reported to increase with age. However, few studies have investigated whether sex moderates such effects. Here, we examined whether inhibitory ability may vary as a function of age and sex, and the interaction between these two factors.

Method: 202 older (mean age = 69.40 years) and younger (mean age =30.59 years) participants who had equivalent educational attainment and self-reported health completed 2 tasks that varied only in the time point at which inhibition should occur: either prior to, or after, encoding.

Results: While we did not find evidence for age or sex differences in inhibitory processes when information needed to be inhibited prior to encoding, when encoded information being actively held in working memory needed to be suppressed, we found that older women were particularly impaired relative to both younger women and men of either age group.

Discussion: These results provide further support for the presence of memorial inhibitory deficits in older age, but add nuance by implicating biological sex as an important mediator in this relationship, with it more difficult for older women to inhibit what was once relevant in memory.

Citing Articles

Older adults compensate for switch, but not mixing costs, relative to younger adults on an intrinsically cued task switching experiment.

Eich T, Langfield C, Sakhardande J, Gazes Y, Habeck C, Stern Y Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1152582.

PMID: 37151844 PMC: 10158939. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1152582.


Principal component analysis suggests multiple dimensions of memory inhibition that are differentially affected by age.

Corlier F, Eich T Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1020915.

PMID: 36825240 PMC: 9941998. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1020915.

References
1.
Smith E, Eich T, Cebenoyan D, Malapani C . Intact and impaired cognitive-control processes in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011; 126(1-3):132-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.022. View

2.
Ahmari S, Eich T, Cebenoyan D, Smith E, Simpson H . Assessing neurocognitive function in psychiatric disorders: a roadmap for enhancing consensus. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014; 115:10-20. PMC: 4250359. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.06.011. View

3.
Nee D, Jonides J . Dissociable interference-control processes in perception and memory. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(5):490-500. PMC: 3972806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02114.x. View

4.
Eich T, Nee D, Insel C, Malapani C, Smith E . Neural correlates of impaired cognitive control over working memory in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 76(2):146-53. PMC: 4984253. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.09.032. View

5.
Gazzaley A, Clapp W, Kelley J, McEvoy K, Knight R, DEsposito M . Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(35):13122-6. PMC: 2529045. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806074105. View