Applications of the Twist Difference to DNA Structural Analysis

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 1988 Feb 1

PMID 3422459

Citations 4

Authors

J H White

W R Bauer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The twist is a fundamental geometric property of nucleic acids. Calculation of the twist in the most general case requires detailed specification of the three-dimensional path of each strand, but many important cases may be analyzed by considering only the twist difference. If C1, C2, and C3 are three distinct space curves, the twist difference about C1 is defined as Tw(C3, C1) - Tw(C2, C1). We show here that this difference measures the rotation of the correspondence surface joining C1 to C2 about the correspondence surface joining C1 to C3. This result has application to DNA containing local nonuniformities, such as denatured regions, cruciforms, and other altered structures. It also facilitates the calculation of twist for three-stranded structures, including D-loops in mitochondrial DNA and replication and transcription intermediates. The twist difference may also be used to simplify greatly the analysis of twist changes in duplex DNA due to winding on surfaces, such as histones and certain enzymes. In such cases the strand-axis twist of DNA divides into two independent terms. The first term arises from the twist of the local reference frame, and the second arises from the rotation of either strand about the duplex axis as measured in the local reference frame. Twist changes consequent to nucleosome winding, for example, arise from the twist of the nucleosome axis, a straight line, about the DNA axis plus the rotation of either strand of the DNA about its axis in the reference frame of the cylinder.

Citing Articles

DNA superhelicity.

Benham C Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 52(1):22-48.

PMID: 37994702 PMC: 10783518. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad1092.

DNA topology in chromosomes: a quantitative survey and its physiological implications.

Barbi M, Mozziconacci J, Wong H, Victor J J Math Biol. 2012; 68(1-2):145-79.

PMID: 23179130 DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0621-y.

Twist and writhe of a DNA loop containing intrinsic bends.

Bauer W, Lund R, White J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(3):833-7.

PMID: 8430093 PMC: 45764. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.833.

Dependence of the linking deficiency of supercoiled minichromosomes upon nucleosome distortion.

White J, Gallo R, Bauer W Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17(14):5827-35.

PMID: 2762154 PMC: 318199. DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.14.5827.

References

Mizuuchi K, Mizuuchi M, Gellert M . Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982; 156(2):229-43. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. View

Shen C . Superhelicity induces hypersensitivity of a human polypyrimidine . polypurine DNA sequence in the human alpha 2-alpha 1 globin intergenic region to S1 nuclease digestion--high resolution mapping of the clustered cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983; 11(22):7899-910. PMC: 326548. DOI: 10.1093/nar/11.22.7899. View

Cantor C . DNA choreography. Cell. 1981; 25(2):293-5. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90045-3. View

Htun H, Lund E, Dahlberg J . Human U1 RNA genes contain an unusually sensitive nuclease S1 cleavage site within the conserved 3' flanking region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984; 81(23):7288-92. PMC: 392131. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7288. View

Richmond T . Protein--DNA interaction. Another folding problem?. Nature. 1987; 326(6108):18-9. DOI: 10.1038/326018a0. View

Panayotatos N, Wells R . Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981; 289(5797):466-70. DOI: 10.1038/289466a0. View

McClarin J, Frederick C, Wang B, Greene P, Boyer H, Grable J . Structure of the DNA-Eco RI endonuclease recognition complex at 3 A resolution. Science. 1986; 234(4783):1526-41. DOI: 10.1126/science.3024321. View

Lilley D . The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77(11):6468-72. PMC: 350306. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6468. View

Travers A, Klug A . Nucleoprotein complexes. DNA wrapping and writhing. Nature. 1987; 327(6120):280-1. DOI: 10.1038/327280a0. View

10.

Sullivan K, Lilley D . Influence of cation size and charge on the extrusion of a salt-dependent cruciform. J Mol Biol. 1987; 193(2):397-404. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90227-0. View

11.

Clayton D . Replication of animal mitochondrial DNA. Cell. 1982; 28(4):693-705. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90049-6. View

12.

DEAN W, Lebowitz J . Partial alteration of secondary structure in native superhelical DNA. Nat New Biol. 1971; 231(18):5-8. View

13.

Lyamichev V, Mirkin S, Frank-Kamenetskii M . Structures of homopurine-homopyrimidine tract in superhelical DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1986; 3(4):667-9. DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1986.10508454. View

14.

Shore D, Baldwin R . Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis. J Mol Biol. 1983; 170(4):983-1007. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80199-5. View

15.

Levitt M . How many base-pairs per turn does DNA have in solution and in chromatin? Some theoretical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978; 75(2):640-4. PMC: 411311. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.640. View

16.

Rau D, Gellert M, Thoma F, Maxwell A . Structure of the DNA gyrase-DNA complex as revealed by transient electric dichroism. J Mol Biol. 1987; 193(3):555-69. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90266-x. View

17.

Marini J, Levene S, Crothers D, Englund P . Bent helical structure in kinetoplast DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(24):7664-8. PMC: 347408. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7664. View

18.

Peck L, Wang J . Sequence dependence of the helical repeat of DNA in solution. Nature. 1981; 292(5821):375-8. DOI: 10.1038/292375a0. View

19.

Gartenberg M, Crothers D . The DNA binding domain and bending angle of E. coli CAP protein. Cell. 1986; 47(6):995-1005. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90814-7. View

20.

Gyurasits E, Wake R . Bidirectional chromosome replication in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol. 1973; 73(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90158-7. View