Lateral Abdominal Muscles Shear Modulus and Thickness Measurements Under Controlled Ultrasound Probe Compression by External Force Sensor: A Comparison and Reliability Study

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2021 Jul 2

PMID 34208168

Citations 6

Authors

Grzegorz Mikolajowski

Malgorzata Palac

Tomasz Wolny

Pawel Linek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a reliability and agreement analysis and to compare lateral abdominal muscles (LAMs) thickness and elasticity results obtained by an experienced operator, by a non-experienced operator, and in an ultrasound imaging probe compression controlled (PCC) condition with minimal force necessary to obtain a proper ultrasound image. The sample consisted of 39 adolescents. An Aixplorer ultrasound scanner was used to evaluate the LAM. The probe in PCC condition was positioned in a prepared probe holder coupled with a pressure sensor. The LAM thickness and elasticity measurements were significantly ( < 0.05) different in the ultrasound PCC condition, compared to results obtained by both examiners. The abdominal oblique external and internal muscle thickness measurements were underestimated and all LAM shear moduli were overestimated during measurements without controlling the probe compression by an external sensor. The intra-class correlation coefficient was excellent in all conditions, but the smallest detectable differences were approximately 43-60% lower during the measurements collected in PCC condition. Differences in LAM measurements between PCC and 'on-hand' conditions may be clinically irrelevant when the force applied by the probe is consciously controlled by the examiner. However, during ultrasound measurements of the LAM morphology, the potential under/over estimation should always be considered when measurements are performed without controlling probe compression by an external sensor.

Citing Articles

Water immersion ultrasound can improve the repeatability of ultrasonic measurement of dorsalis pedis artery diameter and hemodynamic parameters.

Zhang Z, Xu Y, Hao Z, Wang H Ir J Med Sci. 2023; 193(2):987-991.

PMID: 37707689 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03522-3.

Ultrasonic Imaging and Sensors.

Camacho J, Svilainis L, Alvarez-Arenas T Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(20).

PMID: 36298262 PMC: 9611746. DOI: 10.3390/s22207911.

Intra-Rater Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography for the Quantification of Respiratory Muscles in Adolescent Athletes.

Palac M, Linek P Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081075 PMC: 9460867. DOI: 10.3390/s22176622.

Quantitative Analysis of Abdominal Muscles Using Elastography in Female Patients With Incisional Hernia.

Wang B, He K, Zhu Y, Fu X, Yao Q, Chen H Front Surg. 2022; 9:831184.

PMID: 35495759 PMC: 9039235. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.831184.

Feasibility of Using a Portable MyotonPRO Device to Quantify the Elastic Properties of Skeletal Muscle.

Li Y, Liu C, Zhang Z Med Sci Monit. 2022; 28:e934121.

PMID: 35087016 PMC: 8805342. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934121.

References

ShahAli PT PhD S, Arab PT PhD A, Ebrahimi PT PhD E, ShahAli MD S, Rahmani PT PhD N, Negahban PT PhD H . Ultrasound measurement of abdominal muscles during clinical isometric endurance tests in women with and without low back pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018; 35(2):130-138. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1441345. View

Browne J, Watson A, Hoskins P, Elliott A . Investigation of the effect of subcutaneous fat on image quality performance of 2D conventional imaging and tissue harmonic imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31(7):957-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.03.012. View

Linek P, Wolny T, Sikora D, Klepek A . Supersonic Shear Imaging for Quantification of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Shear Modulus in Pediatric Population with Scoliosis: A Reliability and Agreement Study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019; 45(7):1551-1561. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.001. View

Mannion A, Pulkovski N, Toma V, Sprott H . Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects. J Anat. 2009; 213(2):173-82. PMC: 2526114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00946.x. View

Kim D, Kim C, Lee B, Seo D . A comparison of ultrasonography measurement on the abdominal muscle thickness between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy subjects. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017; 31(1):65-74. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-169667. View

Hirayama K, Akagi R, Takahashi H . Reliability of ultrasound elastography for the quantification of transversus abdominis elasticity. Acta Radiol Open. 2015; 4(9):2058460115603420. PMC: 4568934. DOI: 10.1177/2058460115603420. View

MacDonald D, Wan A, McPhee M, Tucker K, Hug F . Reliability of Abdominal Muscle Stiffness Measured Using Elastography during Trunk Rehabilitation Exercises. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42(4):1018-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.002. View

Palmeri M, Nightingale K . What challenges must be overcome before ultrasound elasticity imaging is ready for the clinic?. Imaging Med. 2011; 3(4):433-444. PMC: 3235674. DOI: 10.2217/iim.11.41. View

Herman J, Sedlackova Z, Vachutka J, Furst T, Salzman R, Vomacka J . Shear wave elastography parameters of normal soft tissues of the neck. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2017; 161(3):320-325. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2017.024. View

10.

Taghipour M, Mohseni-Bandpei M, Behtash H, Abdollahi I, Rajabzadeh F, Pourahmadi M . Reliability of Real-time Ultrasound Imaging for the Assessment of Trunk Stabilizer Muscles: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 38(1):15-26. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14661. View

11.

Amerijckx C, Goossens N, Pijnenburg M, Musarra F, van Leeuwen D, Schmitz M . Influence of phase of respiratory cycle on ultrasound imaging of deep abdominal muscle thickness. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020; 46:102105. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102105. View

12.

Linek P, Saulicz E, Wolny T, Mysliwiec A . Intra-rater reliability of B-mode ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles in healthy adolescents during the active straight leg raise test. PM R. 2014; 7(1):53-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.07.007. View

13.

Linek P, Wolny T, Sikora D, Klepek A . Intrarater Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography for the Quantification of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Elasticity in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020; 43(4):303-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.034. View

14.

Rahmani N, Mohseni-Bandpei M, Salavati M, Vameghi R, Abdollahi I . Comparative Study of Abdominal Muscle Thickness on Ultrasonography in Healthy Adolescents and Patients With Low Back Pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 37(4):905-912. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14427. View

15.

Cicchetti D, Sparrow S . Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981; 86(2):127-37. View

16.

Estenne M, Derom E, De Troyer A . Neck and abdominal muscle activity in patients with severe thoracic scoliosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 158(2):452-7. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9710116. View

17.

Linek P, Saulicz E, Wolny T, Mysliwiec A . Body Mass Normalization for Ultrasound Measurements of Adolescent Lateral Abdominal Muscle Thickness. J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 36(4):775-782. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.03086. View

18.

Linek P, Saulicz E, Wolny T, Mysliwiec A . Assessment of the abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre in adolescent physically active girls: A case-control study. J Sport Health Sci. 2018; 6(1):118-124. PMC: 6188935. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.10.002. View

19.

Wilson A, Hides J, Blizzard L, Callisaya M, Cooper A, Srikanth V . Measuring ultrasound images of abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles in older adults: A reliability study. Man Ther. 2016; 23:114-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.01.004. View

20.

de Ledinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, El-Hajbi F, Merrouche W, Rigalleau V . Feasibility of liver transient elastography with FibroScan using a new probe for obese patients. Liver Int. 2010; 30(7):1043-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02258.x. View