» Articles » PMID: 34191578

Increasing the Efficiency of a National Laboratory Response to COVID-19: a Nationwide Multicenter Evaluation of 47 Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays by 41 Laboratories

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34191578
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In response to the worldwide pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the subsequent antibody tests that flooded the market, a nationwide collaborative approach in the Netherlands was employed. Forty-one Dutch laboratories joined forces and shared their evaluation data to allow for the evaluation of a quantity of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 that exceeds the capacity of each individual laboratory. As of April 2020, these performance data had been aggregated and shared in regularly updated reports with other laboratories, Dutch government, public health organizations, and the public. This frequently updated overview of assay performance increased the efficiency of our national laboratory response, supporting laboratories in their choice and implementation of assays. Aggregated performance data for 47 immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 showed that none of the evaluated immunoassays that detect only IgM or IgA met the diagnostic criteria, indicating that they are not suitable for diagnosing acute infections. For the detection of IgG, only the Biozek Corona virus COVID rapid test, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG, and Wantai SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) ELISA met predefined performance criteria in hospitalized patients where samples were collected 14 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO), while for patients with mild or asymptomatic infections, only the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA met the predefined performance criteria if samples were collected 14 days postonset. Here, we describe this unique nationwide collaboration during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; the collected data and their results are an example of what can be accomplished when forces are joined during a public health crisis.

Citing Articles

SARS-CoV-2 cellular and humoral responses in vaccine-naive individuals during the first two waves of COVID-19 infections in the southern region of The Netherlands: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Hanssen D, Arts K, Nix W, Sweelssen N, Welbers T, de Theije C Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(6):e0012624.

PMID: 38686954 PMC: 11237656. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00126-24.


Comprehensive, comparative evaluation of 25 automated SARS-CoV-2 serology assays.

Dimech W, Curley S, Cai J Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 12(1):e0322823.

PMID: 38018986 PMC: 10783060. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03228-23.


The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance.

Llorente F, Perez-Ramirez E, Perez-Olmeda M, Dafouz-Bustos D, Fernandez-Pinero J, Martinez-Cortes M Pathogens. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 38003824 PMC: 10675702. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12111360.


Low prevalence of current and past SARS-CoV-2 infections among visitors and staff members of homelessness services in Amsterdam at the end of the second wave of infections in the Netherlands.

Generaal E, van Santen D, Campman S, Booij M, Price D, Buster M PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288610.

PMID: 37490469 PMC: 10368265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288610.


Comprehensive, Comparative Evaluation of 35 Manual SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays.

Dimech W, Curley S, Subissi L, Stroher U, Perkins M, Cunningham J Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 11(3):e0510122.

PMID: 37158743 PMC: 10269659. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.05101-22.


References
1.
Chvatal-Medina M, Mendez-Cortina Y, Patino P, Velilla P, Rugeles M . Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:633184. PMC: 8081880. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.633184. View

2.
Corman V, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu D . Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25(3). PMC: 6988269. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. View

3.
Reusken C, Broberg E, Haagmans B, Meijer A, Corman V, Papa A . Laboratory readiness and response for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in expert laboratories in 30 EU/EEA countries, January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25(6). PMC: 7029448. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.6.2000082. View

4.
Newcombe R . Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998; 17(8):857-72. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e. View

5.
Mogling R, Meijer A, Berginc N, Bruisten S, Charrel R, Coutard B . Delayed Laboratory Response to COVID-19 Caused by Molecular Diagnostic Contamination. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(8):1944-1946. PMC: 7392437. DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.201843. View