» Articles » PMID: 34191010

Inferring Long-Term Effective Population Size with Mutation-Selection Models

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34191010
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutation-selection phylogenetic codon models are grounded on population genetics first principles and represent a principled approach for investigating the intricate interplay between mutation, selection, and drift. In their current form, mutation-selection codon models are entirely characterized by the collection of site-specific amino-acid fitness profiles. However, thus far, they have relied on the assumption of a constant genetic drift, translating into a unique effective population size (Ne) across the phylogeny, clearly an unrealistic assumption. This assumption can be alleviated by introducing variation in Ne between lineages. In addition to Ne, the mutation rate (μ) is susceptible to vary between lineages, and both should covary with life-history traits (LHTs). This suggests that the model should more globally account for the joint evolutionary process followed by all of these lineage-specific variables (Ne, μ, and LHTs). In this direction, we introduce an extended mutation-selection model jointly reconstructing in a Bayesian Monte Carlo framework the fitness landscape across sites and long-term trends in Ne, μ, and LHTs along the phylogeny, from an alignment of DNA coding sequences and a matrix of observed LHTs in extant species. The model was tested against simulated data and applied to empirical data in mammals, isopods, and primates. The reconstructed history of Ne in these groups appears to correlate with LHTs or ecological variables in a way that suggests that the reconstruction is reasonable, at least in its global trends. On the other hand, the range of variation in Ne inferred across species is surprisingly narrow. This last point suggests that some of the assumptions of the model, in particular concerning the assumed absence of epistatic interactions between sites, are potentially problematic.

Citing Articles

Estimating the proportion of beneficial mutations that are not adaptive in mammals.

Latrille T, Joseph J, Hartasanchez D, Salamin N PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(12):e1011536.

PMID: 39724093 PMC: 11709321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011536.


From teeth to pad: tooth loss and development of keratinous structures in sirenians.

Hautier L, Gomes Rodrigues H, Ferreira-Cardoso S, Emerling C, Porcher M, Asher R Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2011):20231932.

PMID: 38018114 PMC: 10685118. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1932.


Beginner's Guide on the Use of PAML to Detect Positive Selection.

Alvarez-Carretero S, Kapli P, Yang Z Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(4).

PMID: 37096789 PMC: 10127084. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad041.


Genes and sites under adaptation at the phylogenetic scale also exhibit adaptation at the population-genetic scale.

Latrille T, Rodrigue N, Lartillot N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(11):e2214977120.

PMID: 36897968 PMC: 10089192. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214977120.


Jump-Chain Simulation of Markov Substitution Processes Over Phylogenies.

Laurin-Lemay S, Dickson K, Rodrigue N J Mol Evol. 2022; 90(3-4):239-243.

PMID: 35652926 PMC: 9233627. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-022-10058-0.

References
1.
Lanfear R, Ho S, Love D, Bromham L . Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(47):20423-8. PMC: 2996675. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007888107. View

2.
Nielsen R . Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Syst Biol. 2002; 51(5):729-39. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102393. View

3.
Platt A, Weber C, Liberles D . Protein evolution depends on multiple distinct population size parameters. BMC Evol Biol. 2018; 18(1):17. PMC: 5806465. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1085-x. View

4.
Perelman P, Johnson W, Roos C, Seuanez H, Horvath J, Moreira M . A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(3):e1001342. PMC: 3060065. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001342. View

5.
Thorne J, Kishino H . Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst Biol. 2002; 51(5):689-702. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102456. View