» Articles » PMID: 34187191

What Constrains Adaptive Radiation? Documentation and Explanation of Under-evolved Morphologies in Lizards

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34187191
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adaptive radiations fill ecological and morphological space during evolutionary diversification. Why do some trait combinations evolve during such radiations, whereas others do not? 'Required' constraints of pleiotropy and developmental interaction frequently are implicated in explanations for such patterns, but selective forces also may discourage particular trait combinations. Here, we use a dataset of 351 species to demonstrate the dearth of some theoretically plausible trait combinations of limb, toe and tail length in lizards. For example, disproportionately few species display long limbs and short toes. We evaluate recovered patterns within three species of , and find that cladewide patterns are not evident at intraspecific levels. For example, within species, the combination of long limbs and short toes is not significantly rarer than long limbs and long toes. Differences in scale complicate inter- and intraspecific comparisons and disallow concrete conclusions of cause. However, the absence of the interspecific pattern at the intraspecific level is more compatible with selection favouring particular trait combinations than with 'required' forces dictating which trait combinations are available for selection. We also demonstrate the isometry of toe, tail and hindlimb length relative to body length between species but allometry in four of nine trait-body comparisons within species.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons.

Esquerre D, Brennan I, Donnellan S, Keogh J Biol Lett. 2022; 18(12):20220360.

PMID: 36541096 PMC: 9768648. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0360.


The morphological allometry of four closely related and coexisting insect species reveals adaptation to the mean and variability of the resource size.

Fleurot E, Venner S, Pelisson P, Debias F, Bel-Venner M Oecologia. 2022; 200(1-2):159-168.

PMID: 36053351 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05249-x.


Geometric Morphometrics Reveal Shape Differences in the Toes of Urban Lizards.

Howell B, Winchell K, Hagey T Integr Org Biol. 2022; 4(1):obac028.

PMID: 35999968 PMC: 9391197. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obac028.


What constrains adaptive radiation? Documentation and explanation of under-evolved morphologies in lizards.

Poe S, Donald L, Anderson C Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1953):20210340.

PMID: 34187191 PMC: 8242926. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0340.

References
1.
Pelabon C, Bolstad G, Egset C, Cheverud J, Pavlicev M, Rosenqvist G . On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry. Am Nat. 2013; 181(2):195-212. DOI: 10.1086/668820. View

2.
Poe S, Nieto-Montes de Oca A, Torres-Carvajal O, de Queiroz K, Velasco J, Truett B . A Phylogenetic, Biogeographic, and Taxonomic study of all Extant Species of Anolis (Squamata; Iguanidae). Syst Biol. 2017; 66(5):663-697. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx029. View

3.
Cheverud J . PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM. Evolution. 2017; 36(3):499-516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05070.x. View

4.
Willmore K, Klingenberg C, Hallgrimsson B . The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution. 2005; 59(4):898-909. View

5.
Higginson D, Badyaev A, Segraves K, Pitnick S . Causes of Discordance between Allometries at and above Species Level: An Example with Aquatic Beetles. Am Nat. 2015; 186(2):176-86. DOI: 10.1086/682049. View