» Articles » PMID: 34178099

Conservation Insights from Wild Bee Genetic Studies: Geographic Differences, Susceptibility to Inbreeding, and Signs of Local Adaptation

Overview
Journal Evol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34178099
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conserving bees are critical both ecologically and economically. Genetic tools are valuable for monitoring these vital pollinators since tracking these small, fast-flying insects by traditional means is difficult. By surveying the current state of the literature, this review discusses how recent advances in landscape genetic and genomic research are elucidating how wild bees respond to anthropogenic threats. Current literature suggests that there may be geographic differences in the vulnerability of bee species to landscape changes. Populations of temperate bee species are becoming more isolated and more genetically depauperate as their landscape becomes more fragmented, but tropical bee species appear unaffected. These differences may be an artifact of historical differences in land-use, or it suggests that different management plans are needed for temperate and tropical bee species. Encouragingly, genetic studies on invasive bee species indicate that low levels of genetic diversity may not lead to rapid extinction in bees as once predicted. Additionally, next-generation sequencing has given researchers the power to identify potential genes under selection, which are likely critical to species' survival in their rapidly changing environment. While genetic studies provide insights into wild bee biology, more studies focusing on a greater phylogenetic and life-history breadth of species are needed. Therefore, caution should be taken when making broad conservation decisions based on the currently few species examined.

Citing Articles

The impact of geography and climate on the population structure and local adaptation in a wild bee.

Samad-Zada F, Kelemen E, Rehan S Evol Appl. 2023; 16(6):1154-1168.

PMID: 37360027 PMC: 10286232. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13558.


Biology, Genetic Diversity, and Conservation of Wild Bees in Tree Fruit Orchards.

Kline O, Phan N, Porras M, Chavana J, Little C, Stemet L Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36671724 PMC: 9854918. DOI: 10.3390/biology12010031.


Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation.

Kelemen E, Rehan S Evol Appl. 2021; 14(6):1485-1496.

PMID: 34178099 PMC: 8210791. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13221.

References
1.
Bartomeus I, Ascher J, Gibbs J, Danforth B, Wagner D, Hedtke S . Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(12):4656-60. PMC: 3606985. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218503110. View

2.
Guo B, Li Z, Merila J . Population genomic evidence for adaptive differentiation in the Baltic Sea herring. Mol Ecol. 2016; 25(12):2833-52. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13657. View

3.
Hoffmann A, Sgro C . Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature. 2011; 470(7335):479-85. DOI: 10.1038/nature09670. View

4.
Zayed A, Packer L . Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(30):10742-6. PMC: 1180771. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502271102. View

5.
Jones J, Wallberg A, Christmas M, Kapheim K, Webster M . Extreme Differences in Recombination Rate between the Genomes of a Solitary and a Social Bee. Mol Biol Evol. 2019; 36(10):2277-2291. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz130. View