On the Down-sampling of Diffusion MRI Data Along the Angular Dimension

Overview

Journal Magn Reson Imaging

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Radiology

Date 2021 Jun 26

PMID 34174330

Citations 3

Authors

Nan-Kuei Chen

Ryan P Bell

Christina S Meade

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: It has been established that the diffusion gradient directions in diffusion MRI should be uniformly distributed in 3D spherical space, so that orientation-dependent diffusion properties (e.g., fractional anisotropy or FA) can be properly quantified. Sometimes the acquired data need to be down-sampled along the angular dimension before computing diffusion properties (e.g., to exclude data points corrupted by motion artifact; to harmonize data obtained with different protocols). It is important to quantitatively assess the impact of data down-sampling on measurement of diffusion properties.

Materials And Methods: Here we report 1) a numerical procedure for down-sampling diffusion MRI (e.g., for data harmonization), and 2) a spatial uniformity index of diffusion directions, aiming to predict the quality of the chosen down-sampling schemes (e.g., from data harmonization; or rejection of motion corrupted data points). We quantitatively evaluated human diffusion MRI data, which were down-sampled from 64 or 60 diffusion gradient directions to 30 directions, in terms of their 1) FA value accuracy (using fully-sampled data as the ground truth), 2) FA fitting residuals, and 3) spatial uniformity indices.

Results: Our experimental data show that the proposed spatial uniformity index is correlated with errors in FA obtained from down-sampled diffusion MRI data. The FA fitting residuals that are typically used to assess diffusion MRI quality are not correlated with either FA errors or spatial uniformity index.

Conclusions: These results suggest that the spatial uniformity index could be more valuable in assessing quality of down-sampled diffusion MRI data, as compared with FA fitting residual measures. We expect that our implemented software procedure should prove valuable for 1) guiding data harmonization for multi-site diffusion MRI studies, and 2) assessing the impact of rejecting motion corrupted data points on the accuracy of diffusion measures.

Citing Articles

Cocaine Use Prediction With Tensor-Based Machine Learning on Multimodal MRI Connectome Data.

Zhang A, Bell R, An C, Tang R, Hall S, Chan C Neural Comput. 2023; 36(1):107-127.

PMID: 38052079 PMC: 11075092. DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01623.

The Individualized Prediction of Neurocognitive Function in People Living with HIV Based on Clinical and Multimodal Connectome Data.

Li X, Towe S, Bell R, Jiang R, Hall S, Calhoun V IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023; PP.

PMID: 37022271 PMC: 10387132. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3240508.

Strengthened and posterior-shifted structural rich-club organization in people who use cocaine.

Hall S, Bell R, Gadde S, Towe S, Nadeem M, McCann P Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022; 235:109436.

PMID: 35413558 PMC: 9948276. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109436.

References

Tournier J, Mori S, Leemans A . Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65(6):1532-56. PMC: 3366862. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22924. View

Wedeen V, Hagmann P, Tseng W, Reese T, Weisskoff R . Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 54(6):1377-86. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20642. View

Tuch D, Reese T, Wiegell M, Wedeen V . Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture. Neuron. 2003; 40(5):885-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00758-x. View

Jones D, Horsfield M, Simmons A . Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 42(3):515-25. View

Basser P, Pierpaoli C . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B. 1996; 111(3):209-19. DOI: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086. View

Hasan K, Parker D, Alexander A . Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13(5):769-80. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1107. View

Jones D . The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51(4):807-15. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20033. View

Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H . Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage. 2011; 61(2):324-41. PMC: 3683822. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006. View

Kiselev V . Fundamentals of diffusion MRI physics. NMR Biomed. 2017; 30(3). DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3602. View

10.

Truong T, Song A, Chen N . Correction for Eddy Current-Induced Echo-Shifting Effect in Partial-Fourier Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:185026. PMC: 4568076. DOI: 10.1155/2015/185026. View

11.

De Santis S, Gabrielli A, Palombo M, Maraviglia B, Capuani S . Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging: a brief practical review. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 29(10):1410-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.04.006. View

12.

Basser P, Jones D . Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002; 15(7-8):456-67. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.783. View

13.

Andersson J, Skare S . A model-based method for retrospective correction of geometric distortions in diffusion-weighted EPI. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(1):177-99. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1039. View

14.

Tax C, Grussu F, Kaden E, Ning L, Rudrapatna U, Evans C . Cross-scanner and cross-protocol diffusion MRI data harmonisation: A benchmark database and evaluation of algorithms. Neuroimage. 2019; 195:285-299. PMC: 6556555. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.077. View

15.

Mang S, Gembris D, Grodd W, Klose U . Comparison of gradient encoding directions for higher order tensor diffusion data. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 61(2):335-43. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21797. View

16.

Reese T, Heid O, Weisskoff R, Wedeen V . Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49(1):177-82. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10308. View

17.

Mohammadi S, Moller H, Kugel H, Muller D, Deppe M . Correcting eddy current and motion effects by affine whole-brain registrations: evaluation of three-dimensional distortions and comparison with slicewise correction. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64(4):1047-56. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22501. View