» Articles » PMID: 34164464

Machine Learning-based Prediction of Anatomical Outcome After Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2021 Jun 24
PMID 34164464
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery.

Methods: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set.

Results: In the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882-0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958.

Conclusions: Based on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future.

Citing Articles

Supervised machine learning statistical models for visual outcome prediction in macular hole surgery: a single-surgeon, standardized surgery study.

Godani K, Prabhu V, Gandhi P, Choudhary A, Darade S, Kathare R Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025; 11(1):5.

PMID: 39806497 PMC: 11727234. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-025-00630-3.


Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models.

Venkatesh R, Gandhi P, Choudhary A, Sehgal G, Godani K, Darade S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 73(Suppl 1):S66-S71.

PMID: 39723867 PMC: 11834913. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24.


Machine Learning and Optical-Coherence-Tomography-Derived Radiomics Analysis to Predict the Postoperative Anatomical Outcome of Full-Thickness Macular Hole.

Hu Y, Meng Y, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Chen B, Qiu J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39329691 PMC: 11428902. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090949.


Preoperative OCT Characteristics Contributing to Prediction of Postoperative Visual Acuity in Eyes with Macular Hole.

Mase Y, Matsui Y, Imai K, Imamura K, Irie-Ota A, Chujo S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200968 PMC: 11355252. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164826.


Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Imaging Biomarkers in Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Preliminary Data from a Pivotal Trial.

Mariotti C, Mangoni L, Iorio S, Lombardo V, Fruttini D, Rizzo C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38276134 PMC: 10816123. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020628.


References
1.
Rahman W, Chen F, Yeoh J, Patel P, Tufail A, da Cruz L . Repeatability of manual subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using the technique of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 52(5):2267-71. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6024. View

2.
Liu B, Zhang B, Hu Y, Cao D, Yang D, Wu Q . Automatic prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema using ensemble machine learning. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(1):43. PMC: 7859823. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1431. View

3.
Thapa S, Thapa R, Paudyal I, Khanal S, Aujla J, Paudyal G . Prevalence and pattern of vitreo-retinal diseases in Nepal: the Bhaktapur glaucoma study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013; 13:9. PMC: 3616998. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-9. View

4.
Ruiz-Moreno J, Staicu C, Pinero D, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P . Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92(5):640-4. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.136176. View

5.
Abbey A, Van Laere L, Shah A, Hassan T . RECURRENT MACULAR HOLES IN THE ERA OF SMALL-GAUGE VITRECTOMY: A Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Retina. 2016; 37(5):921-924. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001252. View