» Articles » PMID: 34161658

Nonlethal Age Estimation of Three Threatened Fish Species Using DNA Methylation: Australian Lungfish, Murray Cod and Mary River Cod

Overview
Journal Mol Ecol Resour
Date 2021 Jun 23
PMID 34161658
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Age-based demography is fundamental to management of wild fish populations. Age estimates for individuals can determine rates of change in key life-history parameters such as length, maturity, mortality and fecundity. These age-based characteristics are critical for population viability analysis in endangered species and for developing sustainable harvest strategies. For teleost fish, age has traditionally been determined by counting increments formed in calcified structures such as otoliths. However, the collection of otoliths is lethal and therefore undesirable for threatened species. At a molecular level, age can be predicted by measuring DNA methylation. Here, we use previously identified age-associated sites of DNA methylation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) to develop two epigenetic clocks for three threatened freshwater fish species. One epigenetic clock was developed for the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) and the second for the Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) and Mary River cod (Maccullochella mariensis). Age estimation models were calibrated using either known-age individuals, ages derived from otoliths or bomb radiocarbon dating of scales. We demonstrate a high Pearson's correlation between the chronological and predicted age in both the Lungfish clock (cor = .98) and Maccullochella clock (cor = .92). The median absolute error rate for both epigenetic clocks was also low (Lungfish = 0.86 years; Maccullochella = 0.34 years). This study demonstrates the transferability of DNA methylation sites for age prediction between highly phylogenetically divergent fish species. Given the method is nonlethal and suited to automation, age prediction by DNA methylation has the potential to improve fisheries and other wildlife management settings.

Citing Articles

Environmental DNA Epigenetics Accurately Predicts the Age of Cultured Fish Larvae.

Ruiz E, Leprieur F, Sposito G, Luthi M, Schmidlin M, Panfili J Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70645.

PMID: 39944907 PMC: 11821287. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70645.


Noninvasive, epigenetic age estimation in an elasmobranch, the cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus).

Nick Weber D, Wyffels J, Buckner C, George R, Ed Latson F, LePage V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26261.

PMID: 39482525 PMC: 11528000. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78004-2.


Increased scalability and sequencing quality of an epigenetic age prediction assay.

Mayne B, Chandler D, Noune C, Espinoza T, Roberts D, Anderson C PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0297006.

PMID: 38743704 PMC: 11093300. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297006.


Advances in environmental DNA monitoring: standardization, automation, and emerging technologies in aquatic ecosystems.

Lu S, Zeng H, Xiong F, Yao M, He S Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 67(7):1368-1384.

PMID: 38512561 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2493-5.


Age estimation of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) based on DNA methylation: An exploratory analysis using methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM).

Arai K, Qi H, Inoue-Murayama M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0294994.

PMID: 38079426 PMC: 10712859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294994.


References
1.
Heather J, Chain B . The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA. Genomics. 2015; 107(1):1-8. PMC: 4727787. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.11.003. View

2.
Lu J, Johnston A, Berichon P, Ru K, Korbie D, Trau M . PrimerSuite: A High-Throughput Web-Based Primer Design Program for Multiplex Bisulfite PCR. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41328. PMC: 5259761. DOI: 10.1038/srep41328. View

3.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J Stat Softw. 2010; 33(1):1-22. PMC: 2929880. View

4.
Couch A, Unmack P, Dyer F, Lintermans M . Who's your mama? Riverine hybridisation of threatened freshwater Trout Cod and Murray Cod. PeerJ. 2016; 4:e2593. PMC: 5088581. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2593. View

5.
Moen E, Handegard N, Allken V, Albert O, Harbitz A, Malde K . Automatic interpretation of otoliths using deep learning. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0204713. PMC: 6296523. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204713. View