» Articles » PMID: 34160828

Defibrillation Threshold of Internal Cardioversion Prior to Ablation Predicts Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence

Overview
Journal Clin Cardiol
Date 2021 Jun 23
PMID 34160828
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many studies have reported the predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after persistent AF (peAF) ablation. However, the correlation between the atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) for internal cardioversion (IC) and AF recurrence rate is unknown. Here we investigated the relationship between the DFT prior to catheter ablation for peAF and AF recurrence.

Hypothesis: DFT prior to ablation was the predictive factor for AF recurrence after peAF ablation.

Methods: From June 2016 to May 2019, we enrolled 82 consecutive patients (mean age, 65.0 ± 12.4 years), including 45 with peAF and 37 with long-standing peAF, at Hamamatsu Medical Center. To assess the DFT, we performed IC with gradually increasing energy prior to radiofrequency application.

Results: Forty-nine and 33 patients showed DFT values less than or equal to 10 J (group A) and greater than 10 J or unsuccessful defibrillation (group B). During the mean follow-up duration of 20.5 ± 13.1 months, patients in group B showed significantly higher AF recurrence rates than those in group A after the ablation procedure (p = .017). Multivariate analysis revealed that DFT was the only predictive factor for AF recurrence (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.13, p = .047).

Conclusions: The DFT for IC was among the strongest prognostic factors in the peAF ablation procedure.

Citing Articles

Optimal patient selection for maze procedure in patients undergoing mitral valve disease.

Masuda T, Aoki A, Omoto T, Maruta K J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):190.

PMID: 38589914 PMC: 11003012. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02766-z.


Defibrillation threshold of internal cardioversion prior to ablation predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Sawasaki K, Inden Y, Hosoya N, Muto M, Murohara T Clin Cardiol. 2021; 44(8):1169-1176.

PMID: 34160828 PMC: 8364735. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23679.

References
1.
Sakata K, Okuyama Y, Ozawa T, Haraguchi R, Nakazawa K, Tsuchiya T . Not all rotors, effective ablation targets for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, are included in areas suggested by conventional indirect indicators of atrial fibrillation drivers: ExTRa Mapping project. J Arrhythm. 2018; 34(2):176-184. PMC: 5891413. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12036. View

2.
Ogino Y, Ishikawa T, Ishigami T, Matsumoto K, Hosoda J, Iguchi K . Characteristics and Prognosis of Pacemaker-Identified New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Japanese People. Circ J. 2017; 81(6):794-798. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1018. View

3.
Soeki T, Matsuura T, Tobiume T, Bando S, Matsumoto K, Nagano H . Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Parameter Combination Predicts the Onset of Atrial Fibrillation. Circ J. 2018; 82(9):2253-2258. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0758. View

4.
Verma A, Jiang C, Betts T, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R . Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(19):1812-22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288. View

5.
Nielsen J, Johannessen A, Raatikainen P, Hindricks G, Walfridsson H, Kongstad O . Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(17):1587-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113566. View