The Effect of Action Observation on Aesthetic Preference of Chinese Calligraphy: An FMRI Study

Overview

Journal Brain Behav

Specialty Psychology

Date 2021 Jun 21

PMID 34152097

Citations 1

Authors

Mingcheng He

Wei Zhang

Jiamin Deng

Xianyou He

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: There is some evidence suggesting that movement perception has an effect on aesthetic experience. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the observation of creators' creative action (the process that calligraphers create calligraphy) remain unclear.

Methods: In this study, participants were scanned with fMRI while performing aesthetic judgments on Chinese calligraphy images with/without action observation.

Results: Behavioral results showed that both the work by the expert and novice with action observation were rated significantly higher on aesthetic preference than those without action observation. Imaging results showed that brain regions associated with perceptual, cognitive, and emotional processing were commonly activated by calligraphy images with/without action observation. However, compared with no action observation, aesthetic judgments of calligraphy images with action observation elicited stronger activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and the bilateral insula. Meanwhile, the superior parietal lobe which is associated with relevant inner action imitation, was also activated when observing the creator's action.

Conclusions: Brain activation in the superior parietal lobe, anterior cingulate cortex, and the bilateral insula indicated that observing the creative action of the creators contributed to the aesthetic experience of the observer.

Citing Articles

The effect of action observation on aesthetic preference of Chinese calligraphy: An fMRI study.

He M, Zhang W, Deng J, He X Brain Behav. 2021; 11(8):e2265.

PMID: 34152097 PMC: 8413759. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2265.

References

Nadal M . The experience of art: insights from neuroimaging. Prog Brain Res. 2013; 204:135-58. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63287-6.00007-5. View

Lebreton M, Kawa S, Forgeot dArc B, Daunizeau J, Pessiglione M . Your goal is mine: unraveling mimetic desires in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(21):7146-57. PMC: 6622314. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4821-11.2012. View

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J . Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009; 33(7):975-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.010. View

Ticini L, Rachman L, Pelletier J, Dubal S . Enhancing aesthetic appreciation by priming canvases with actions that match the artist's painting style. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:391. PMC: 4043134. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00391. View

Gao C, Guo C . The Experience of Beauty of Chinese Poetry and Its Neural Substrates. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1540. PMC: 6110881. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01540. View

Wassiliwizky E, Koelsch S, Wagner V, Jacobsen T, Menninghaus W . The emotional power of poetry: neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017; 12(8):1229-1240. PMC: 5597896. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx069. View

Ishizu T, Zeki S . The experience of beauty derived from sorrow. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(8):4185-4200. PMC: 5518297. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23657. View

Cross E, Kraemer D, F de C Hamilton A, Kelley W, Grafton S . Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(2):315-26. PMC: 2638791. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn083. View

Frischen A, Loach D, Tipper S . Seeing the world through another person's eyes: simulating selective attention via action observation. Cognition. 2009; 111(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.003. View

10.

Kilner J, Friston K, Frith C . The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. Neuroreport. 2007; 18(6):619-23. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281139ed0. View

11.

He M, Zhang W, Deng J, He X . The effect of action observation on aesthetic preference of Chinese calligraphy: An fMRI study. Brain Behav. 2021; 11(8):e2265. PMC: 8413759. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2265. View

12.

Urgesi C, Berlucchi G, Aglioti S . Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(23):2130-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.031. View

13.

Zhang W, He X, Liu S, Li T, Li J, Tang X . Neural correlates of appreciating natural landscape and landscape garden: Evidence from an fMRI study. Brain Behav. 2019; 9(7):e01335. PMC: 6625478. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1335. View

14.

Di Dio C, Ardizzi M, Massaro D, Di Cesare G, Gilli G, Marchetti A . Human, Nature, Dynamism: The Effects of Content and Movement Perception on Brain Activations during the Aesthetic Judgment of Representational Paintings. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 9:705. PMC: 4709505. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00705. View

15.

Zhang W, Lai S, He X, Zhao X, Lai S . Neural correlates for aesthetic appraisal of pictograph and its referent: An fMRI study. Behav Brain Res. 2016; 305:229-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.029. View

16.

Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird A, Eickhoff S . ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(3):1148-67. PMC: 4981639. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112. View

17.

Gonzalez-Rosa J, Natali F, Tettamanti A, Cursi M, Velikova S, Comi G . Action observation and motor imagery in performance of complex movements: evidence from EEG and kinematics analysis. Behav Brain Res. 2014; 281:290-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016. View

18.

Zhao X, Wang J, Li J, Luo G, Li T, Chatterjee A . The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):20774. PMC: 7695698. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77658-y. View

19.

Bohrn I, Altmann U, Lubrich O, Menninghaus W, Jacobs A . When we like what we know--a parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain Lang. 2013; 124(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003. View

20.

Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P . Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8(4):364-82. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3. View