» Articles » PMID: 34149898

CXCR4 is a Prognostic Marker That Inhibits the Invasion and Migration of Gastric Cancer by Regulating VEGF Expression

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jun 21
PMID 34149898
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metastasis is the main cause of poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Thus, current research is focused on identifying biomarkers that can predict the prognosis of patients with GC. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been reported to play important roles in different types of malignancies; however, their role in the prognosis of GC remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the potential role of CXCR4 and VEGF in predicting the prognosis of patients with GC. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed to analyze the expression levels of CXCR4 and VEGF in a GC tissue microarray containing GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The association between CXCR4 or VEGF expression levels and the clinicopathological characteristics or survival outcomes were assessed. Furthermore, Transwell and wound healing assays were performed to determine the cell invasive and migratory abilities . The results demonstrated that CXCR4 promoted AGS cell invasion and migration by regulating VEGF expression. In addition, CXCR4 and VEGF expression levels were significantly upregulated in GC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues, which was associated with a poorer overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that both upregulated CXCR4 and VEGF expression were independent negative biomarkers of OS. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to discover that CXCR4 and VEGF exert synergistic roles as efficient prognostic indicators for patients with GC.

Citing Articles

Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: A View from a Proteomics Perspective.

Jain V, Sakhuja P, Agarwal A, Sirdeshmukh R, Siraj F, Gautam P Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(8):4455-4475.

PMID: 39195316 PMC: 11352871. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080333.


Development of a CD8+ T cell associated signature for predicting the prognosis and immunological characteristics of gastric cancer by integrating single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing.

Li J, Han T, Wang X, Wang Y, Yang R, Yang Q Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4524.

PMID: 38402299 PMC: 10894294. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54273-9.


Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related immune biomarker signature to enhance prognostic accuracy in gastric cancer.

Li J, Yu T, Sun J, Zeng Z, Liu Z, Ma M Aging (Albany NY). 2023; 15(7):2772-2796.

PMID: 37036489 PMC: 10120894. DOI: 10.18632/aging.204646.


KDM6B promotes gastric carcinogenesis and metastasis via upregulation of CXCR4 expression.

Liu F, Wang Y, Yang Z, Cui X, Zheng L, Fu Y Cell Death Dis. 2022; 13(12):1068.

PMID: 36564369 PMC: 9789124. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05458-5.

References
1.
Bai J, Zhou Y, Chen G, Zeng J, Ding J, Tan Y . Overexpression of Cullin1 is associated with poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Hum Pathol. 2010; 42(3):375-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.09.003. View

2.
Nazari A, Khorramdelazad H, Hassanshahi G . Biological/pathological functions of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axes in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017; 22(6):991-1000. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1187-x. View

3.
Chen C, Chi H, Min L, Junhua Z . Downregulation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta 1 (GNB1) is associated with worsened prognosis of clearcell renal cell carcinoma and is related to VEGF signaling pathway. J BUON. 2018; 22(6):1441-1446. View

4.
Valastyan S, Weinberg R . Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011; 147(2):275-92. PMC: 3261217. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024. View

5.
Stumpf C, Kaemmerer D, Neubauer E, Sanger J, Schulz S, Lupp A . Somatostatin and CXCR4 expression patterns in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung relative to small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018; 144(10):1921-1932. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2722-5. View