» Articles » PMID: 34142365

Correlation Between Age, Coronal and Sagittal Parameters and Spine Flexibility in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Overview
Journal Spine Deform
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2021 Jun 18
PMID 34142365
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between spine flexibility and age, skeletal maturity, coronal and sagittal parameters for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: All AIS patients evaluated for surgery were included. Following parameters were obtained: age, gender, skeletal maturity (Risser and Sanders), Cobb angle at high thoracic (HT), mean thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) level, flexibility of HT, MT and TL/L curves, coronal and sagittal parameters. A multivariate diagnostic through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient ([Formula: see text]) was performed.

Results: Data from 200 patients were obtained (30 males, age 15 ± 1.9 years). No significant correlation was found between curve flexibility and age or gender. A negative correlation was observed between flexibility of MT curves and magnitude of HT ([Formula: see text] = - 0.4) and MT curves ([Formula: see text] = - 0.4). A weak correlation among curve flexibility at different levels was observed: the flexibility of HT curves correlated with the flexibility of MT and TL/L curves, and the flexibility of MT curves correlated with flexibility TL/L curves. A negative correlation between flexibility of MT curves and AVT-T (thoracic apical vertebral translation) ([Formula: see text] = - 0.2) was evidenced. No correlations between flexibility and sagittal parameters were observed.

Conclusions: No strong correlation were observed between curve flexibility and age or skeletal maturity. A negative correlation between curve magnitude and flexibility at thoracic level was demonstrated. Furthermore, a weak positive correlation between flexibility of PT, MT and TL/L curves was observed.

Citing Articles

Are We Looking at a Paradigm Shift in the Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis of 75 Patients of Nonfusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction with 2-5-Year Follow-up: A Single Center Experience.

Hegde S, Badikillaya V, Kanade U, Akbari K, Achar S, Reddy H Asian Spine J. 2023; 17(3):529-537.

PMID: 37211667 PMC: 10300882. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2022.0267.


Clinical differences in preoperative symptoms and surgical outcomes between early and late-teen patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Banno T, Yamato Y, Oba H, Ohba T, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(7):2541-2549.

PMID: 37209208 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07758-6.


Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Baroncini A, Trobisch P, Eschweiler J, Migliorini F Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(9):2348-2354.

PMID: 35507127 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07231-w.

References
1.
Trobisch P, Ducoffe A, Lonner B, Errico T . Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21(9):519-28. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-519. View

2.
Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan S . Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(14):1637-42. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2. View

3.
Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F, Antinnes J, Smith J, Hu S . Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(21):2346-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00007. View

4.
Eyvazov K, Samartzis D, Cheung J . The association of lumbar curve magnitude and spinal range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):51. PMC: 5282845. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1423-6. View

5.
da Costa B, Cevallos M, Altman D, Rutjes A, Egger M . Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open. 2011; 1(1):e000048. PMC: 3191404. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000048. View