MRI Signal Distribution Within the Intervertebral Disc As a Biomarker of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Spondylolisthesis

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2012 Dec 5

PMID 23206365

Citations 14

Authors

Julien Gervais

Delphine Perie

Stefan Parent

Hubert Labelle

Carl-Eric Aubin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Early stages of scoliosis and spondylolisthesis entail changes in the intervertebral disc (IVD) structure and biochemistry. The current clinical use of MR T2-weighted images is limited to visual inspection. Our hypothesis is that the distribution of the MRI signal intensity within the IVD in T2-weighted images depends on the spinal pathology and on its severity. Therefore, this study aims to develop the AMRSID (analysis of MR signal intensity distribution) method to analyze the 3D distribution of the MR signal intensity within the IVD and to evaluate their sensitivity to scoliosis and spondylolisthesis and their severities.

Methods: This study was realized on 79 adolescents who underwent a MRI acquisition (sagittal T2-weighted images) before their orthopedic or surgical treatment. Five groups were considered: low severity scoliosis (Cobb angle ≤50°), high severity scoliosis (Cobb angles >50°), low severity spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades I and II), high severity spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades III, IV and V) and control. The distribution of the MRI signal intensity within the IVD was analyzed using the descriptive statistics of histograms normalized by either cerebrospinal fluid or bone signal intensity, weighted centers and volume ratios. Differences between pathology and severity groups were assessed using one- and two-way ANOVAs.

Results: There were significant (p < 0.05) variations of indices between scoliosis, spondylolithesis and control groups and between low and high severity groups. The cerebrospinal fluid normalization was able to detect differences between healthy and pathologic IVDs whereas the bone normalization, which reflects both bone and IVD health, detected more differences between the severities of these pathologies.

Conclusions: This study proves for the first time that changes in the intervertebral disc, non visible to the naked eye on sagittal T2-weighted MR images of the spine, can be detected from specific indices describing the distribution of the MR signal intensity. Moreover, these indices are able to discriminate between scoliosis and spondylolisthesis and their severities, and provide essential information on the composition and structure of the discs whatever the pathology considered. The AMRSID method may have the potential to complement the current diagnostic tools available in clinics to improve the diagnostic with earlier biomarkers, the prognosis of evolution and the treatment options of scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.

Citing Articles

Does intervertebral disc degeneration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with patient-reported pain scores? A review of 968 cases.

Boylan C, Thimmaiah R, McKay G, Gardner A, Newton Ede M, Mehta J Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(2):687-694.

PMID: 38175248 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08082-9.

Morphological alterations of lumbar intervertebral discs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Foltz M, Johnson C, Truong W, Polly Jr D, Ellingson A Spine J. 2023; 24(1):172-184.

PMID: 37611875 PMC: 10843277. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.012.

Fibrotic alterations in human annulus fibrosus correlate with progression of intervertebral disc herniation.

Castro A, Ribeiro-Machado C, Oliveira C, Teixeira G, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Pereira P Arthritis Res Ther. 2022; 24(1):25.

PMID: 35039075 PMC: 8762926. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02690-w.

An adhesion G protein-coupled receptor is required in cartilaginous and dense connective tissues to maintain spine alignment.

Liu Z, Hussien A, Wang Y, Heckmann T, Gonzalez R, Karner C Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34318745 PMC: 8328515. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67781.

Assessment of sagittal spinopelvic parameters in a Taiwanese population with spondylolysis by the EOS imaging system: a retrospective radiological analysis.

Chuang H, Tseng Y, Chen Y, Chou P, Chang W, Su P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):553.

PMID: 34144702 PMC: 8214289. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04440-0.

References

Zuo J, Joseph G, Li X, Link T, Hu S, Berven S . In vivo intervertebral disc characterization using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and T1ρ imaging: association with discography and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(3):214-21. PMC: 3633556. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182294a63. View

Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S, Thomas J, Dillin W, WATKINS R . Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(3):276-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198704000-00016. View

Perie D, Curnier D . Effect of pathology type and severity on the distribution of MRI signal intensities within the degenerated nucleus pulposus: application to idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:189. PMC: 2940851. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-189. View

Mwale F, Iatridis J, Antoniou J . Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17 Suppl 4:432-40. PMC: 2587663. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0744-4. View

Nguyen A, Johannessen W, Yoder J, Wheaton A, Vresilovic E, Borthakur A . Noninvasive quantification of human nucleus pulposus pressure with use of T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4):796-802. PMC: 2657301. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00667. View

Yu S, Haughton V, SETHER L, Wagner M . Anulus fibrosus in bulging intervertebral disks. Radiology. 1988; 169(3):761-3. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.169.3.3186998. View

Chen I, Wei T . Disc height and lumbar index as independent predictors of degenerative spondylolisthesis in middle-aged women with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(13):1402-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8fbd. View

Linson M, Crowe C . Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and lumbar discography in the diagnosis of disc degeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (250):160-3. View

Hedman T, Fernie G . In vivo measurement of lumbar spinal creep in two seated postures using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(2):178-83. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199501150-00008. View

10.

Brault J, Driscoll D, Laakso L, Kappler R, Allin E, Glonek T . Quantification of lumbar intradiscal deformation during flexion and extension, by mathematical analysis of magnetic resonance imaging pixel intensity profiles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(18):2066-72. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199709150-00002. View

11.

Kerttula L, Serlo W, Tervonen O, Paakko E, Vanharanta H . Post-traumatic findings of the spine after earlier vertebral fracture in young patients: clinical and MRI study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(9):1104-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00011. View

12.

Michopoulou S, Costaridou L, Panagiotopoulos E, Speller R, Panayiotakis G, Todd-Pokropek A . Atlas-based segmentation of degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images of the spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 56(9):2225-31. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2019765. View

13.

Bushell G, Ghosh P, Taylor T, Sutherland J . The collagen of the intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979; 61-B(4):501-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.61B4.500764. View

14.

Endean A, Palmer K, Coggon D . Potential of magnetic resonance imaging findings to refine case definition for mechanical low back pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 36(2):160-9. PMC: 3088902. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd9adb. View

15.

Patriarche J, Erickson B . Part 2. Automated change detection and characterization applied to serial MR of brain tumors may detect progression earlier than human experts. J Digit Imaging. 2007; 20(4):321-8. PMC: 3043917. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-1039-0. View

16.

Fennell A, Jones A, Hukins D . Migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc during flexion and extension of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(23):2753-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00009. View

17.

Perie D, Sales de Gauzy J, Curnier D, Hobatho M . Intervertebral disc modeling using a MRI method: migration of the nucleus zone within scoliotic intervertebral discs. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 19(9):1245-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(01)00452-0. View

18.

Antoniou J, Pike G, Steffen T, Baramki H, Poole A, Aebi M . Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 40(6):900-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910400616. View

19.

Ludescher B, Effelsberg J, Martirosian P, Steidle G, Markert B, Claussen C . T2- and diffusion-maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: an in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28(1):252-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21390. View

20.

Horton W, Daftari T . Which disc as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging is actually a source of pain? A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(6 Suppl):S164-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199206001-00018. View