Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: an Orthopedic and Dentistry Overview

Overview

Journal Braz J Med Biol Res

Specialties Biology
General Medicine

Date 2021 Jun 16

PMID 34133539

Citations 27

Authors

J Giron

E Kerstner

T Medeiros

L Oliveira

G M Machado

C F Malfatti

P Pranke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Because bone-associated diseases are increasing, a variety of tissue engineering approaches with bone regeneration purposes have been proposed over the last years. Bone tissue provides a number of important physiological and structural functions in the human body, being essential for hematopoietic maintenance and for providing support and protection of vital organs. Therefore, efforts to develop the ideal scaffold which is able to guide the bone regeneration processes is a relevant target for tissue engineering researchers. Several techniques have been used for scaffolding approaches, such as diverse types of biomaterials. On the other hand, metallic biomaterials are widely used as support devices in dentistry and orthopedics, constituting an important complement for the scaffolds. Hence, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the degradable biomaterials and metal biomaterials proposed for bone regeneration in the orthopedic and dentistry fields in the last years.

Citing Articles

Management of pediatric ankle fractures: comparison of biodegradable PLGA implants with traditional metal screws.

Nudelman H, Lorincz A, Lamberti A, Varga M, Kassai T, Jozsa G Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1410750.

PMID: 39539764 PMC: 11558883. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1410750.

Unleashing innovation: 3D-printed biomaterials in bone tissue engineering for repairing femur and tibial defects in animal models - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sagar N, Chakravarti B, Maurya S, Nigam A, Malakar P, Kashyap R Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1385365.

PMID: 39386047 PMC: 11462855. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1385365.

Biocomposite Scaffolds Based on Chitosan Extraction from Shrimp Shell Waste for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Application.

Chonanant C, Chancharoen P, Kiatkulanusorn S, Luangpon N, Klarod K, Surakul P ACS Omega. 2024; 9(38):39419-39429.

PMID: 39346874 PMC: 11425810. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02910.

Hydroxyapatite-Based Natural Biopolymer Composite for Tissue Regeneration.

Alkaron W, Almansoori A, Balazsi K, Balazsi C Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203295 PMC: 11356673. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164117.

Conventional Manufacturing by Pouring Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Implants.

Zoller T, Schmal H, Ahlhelm M, Mayr H, Seidenstuecker M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200264 PMC: 11351892. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081800.

References

Wang L, Ma X, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Li X, Hu Y . Repair of segmental bone defect using Totally Vitalized tissue engineered bone graft by a combined perfusion seeding and culture system. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94276. PMC: 3984127. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094276. View

Huang Y, Jakus A, Jordan S, Dumanian Z, Parker K, Zhao L . Three-Dimensionally Printed Hyperelastic Bone Scaffolds Accelerate Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Calvarial Bone Defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(5):1397-1407. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005530. View

Manfrini M, Di Bona C, Canella A, Lucarelli E, Pellati A, DAgostino A . Mesenchymal stem cells from patients to assay bone graft substitutes. J Cell Physiol. 2012; 228(6):1229-37. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24276. View

Oliveira P, de Melo Soares M, Silveira E Souza A, Taba Jr M, Palioto D, Messora M . Influence of nano-hydroxyapatite coating implants on gene expression of osteogenic markers and micro-CT parameters. An in vivo study in diabetic rats. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020; 109(5):682-694. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37052. View

Rickert D, Sauerbier S, Nagursky H, Menne D, Vissink A, Raghoebar G . Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 22(3):251-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01981.x. View

Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson B, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B . Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials. 1996; 17(6):605-16. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)88711-4. View

Gomes C, Moreira L, Santos V, Ramos A, Lyon J, Soares C . Assessment of the genetic risks of a metallic alloy used in medical implants. Genet Mol Biol. 2011; 34(1):116-21. PMC: 3085356. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000118. View

Zhang W, Shi W, Wu S, Kuss M, Jiang X, Untrauer J . 3D printed composite scaffolds with dual small molecule delivery for mandibular bone regeneration. Biofabrication. 2020; 12(3):035020. PMC: 8059098. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab906e. View

Yu Q, Wang C, Yang J, Guo C, Zhang S . Mineralized collagen/Mg-Ca alloy combined scaffolds with improved biocompatibility for enhanced bone response following tooth extraction. Biomed Mater. 2018; 13(6):065008. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aadb47. View

10.

Wagoner Johnson A, Herschler B . A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomater. 2010; 7(1):16-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.012. View

11.

Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis P . Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011; 9:66. PMC: 3123714. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-66. View

12.

Wu Z, Meng Z, Wu Q, Zeng D, Guo Z, Yao J . Biomimetic and osteogenic 3D silk fibroin composite scaffolds with nano MgO and mineralized hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration. J Tissue Eng. 2020; 11:2041731420967791. PMC: 7705190. DOI: 10.1177/2041731420967791. View

13.

Jager M, Herten M, Fochtmann U, Fischer J, Hernigou P, Zilkens C . Bridging the gap: bone marrow aspiration concentrate reduces autologous bone grafting in osseous defects. J Orthop Res. 2010; 29(2):173-80. DOI: 10.1002/jor.21230. View

14.

Zamiri B, Shahidi S, Baghaban Eslaminejad M, Khoshzaban A, Gholami M, Bahramnejad E . Reconstruction of human mandibular continuity defects with allogenic scaffold and autologous marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24(4):1292-7. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318294288a. View

15.

Sajnog A, Hanc A, Koczorowski R, Makuch K, Baralkiewicz D . Usefulness of laser ablation ICP-MS for analysis of metallic particles released to oral mucosa after insertion of dental implants. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018; 46:46-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.11.007. View

16.

Zhao L, Xu T, Hu W, Chung K . Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: A prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(3):333-344. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12585. View

17.

Maurmann N, Sperling L, Pranke P . Electrospun and Electrosprayed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1078:79-100. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0950-2_5. View

18.

Rodriguez-Cano A, Cintas P, Fernandez-Calderon M, Pacha-Olivenza M, Crespo L, Saldana L . Controlled silanization-amination reactions on the Ti6Al4V surface for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013; 106:248-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.034. View

19.

Zhu L, Luo D, Liu Y . Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration. Int J Oral Sci. 2020; 12(1):6. PMC: 7002518. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-020-0073-y. View

20.

Giuliani A, Manescu A, Mohammadi S, Mazzoni S, Piattelli A, Mangano F . Quantitative Kinetics Evaluation of Blocks Versus Granules of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds (HA/β-TCP 30/70) by Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Microtomography: A Human Study. Implant Dent. 2015; 25(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000363. View