» Articles » PMID: 34130880

Predicting Long-Term Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transarterial Radioembolization Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Initial Experiences

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Jun 16
PMID 34130880
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional cross-sectional imaging done shortly after radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) does not reliably predict long-term response to treatment. This study evaluated whether quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can predict the long-term response of HCC to yttrium-90 (Y-90) treatment. Fifteen patients underwent CEUS at three time points: immediately following treatment and 1 and 2 wk post-treatment. Response 3-6 mo after treatment was categorized on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging by two experienced radiologists using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. CEUS data were analyzed by quantifying tumor perfusion and residual fractional vascularity using time-intensity curves. Patients with stable disease on magnetic resonance imaging had significantly greater fractional vascularity 2 wk post-treatment (65.15%) than those with partial or complete response (13.8 ± 9.9%, p = 0.007, and 14.9 ± 15.4%, p = 0.009, respectively). Complete responders had lower tumor vascularity at 2 wk than at post-operative examination (-38.3 ± 15.4%, p = 0.045). Thus, this pilot study suggests CEUS may provide an earlier indication of Y-90 treatment response than cross-sectional imaging.

Citing Articles

Contrast-enhanced US Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Chemoembolization: A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Savsani E, Shaw C, Forsberg F, Wessner C, Lyshchik A, OKane P Radiology. 2023; 309(1):e230727.

PMID: 37847138 PMC: 10623205. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230727.


Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hai Y, Savsani E, Chong W, Eisenbrey J, Lyshchik A Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(11):5162-5179.

PMID: 34410432 PMC: 8569603. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03248-9.

References
1.
Krix M, Kiessling F, Vosseler S, Kiessling I, Le-Huu M, Fusenig N . Comparison of intermittent-bolus contrast imaging with conventional power Doppler sonography: quantification of tumour perfusion in small animals. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29(8):1093-103. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00060-7. View

2.
Chong W, Papadopoulou V, Dayton P . Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 43(4):762-772. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1516-1. View

3.
Llovet J, Bruix J . Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003; 37(2):429-42. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047. View

4.
Lewandowski R, Kulik L, Riaz A, Senthilnathan S, Mulcahy M, Ryu R . A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9(8):1920-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02695.x. View

5.
Kolligs F, Bilbao J, Jakobs T, Inarrairaegui M, Nagel J, Rodriguez M . Pilot randomized trial of selective internal radiation therapy vs. chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2014; 35(6):1715-21. DOI: 10.1111/liv.12750. View